Wednesday, January 8, 2014

#1810: Marine Links MI-3 Honeypot Hotel Management to Clinton Triaged Firefighters, Naudet Duane St. Snuff

Plum City – ( United States Marine Field McConnell has linked the Honeypot Hotel Management (HHM) services of Lord Thurso’s MI-3 Innholders Livery Company to Hillary Clinton’s apparent triage of 343 members of the New York City Fire Department and the Naudet Brothers’ alleged use of the Duane Street Hotel Wi-Fi system to coordinate script-kiddie production of “the first live-broadcast mass [3:11] snuff film in human history.”

9/11 2001 Nine News Melbourne Australian News coverage of World Trade Center Attacks Peter Hitchener [Spot the script kiddies!!!]

Strange Features Found in the Naudet Brothers First Strike Footage

9/11 FireFighter John Schroeder: twin explosion, finds dead body, Naudet Scam

McConnell alleges that the MI-3 Innholders launched the Honeypot Hotel Management service to entrap and extort world leaders in response to a script-kiddie proposal by the late General Alexander Haig, the founder director of America Online, to his fellow Bilderberg delegates at the Chauncey (?) Hotel and Conference Center, Princeton, NJ in 1978.

"Being There" Movie Trailer starring Peter Sellers [Chauncey !!!! Gardner] and Shirley MacLaine

McConnell also claims that Hillary Clinton brokered the development of Wi-Fi patent pool devices for Lord Thurso’s MI-3 Honeypot Hotel Management service and authorized Serco and its SBA protégée Base One Technologies to pre-position pre-tagged script kiddies in hotels close enough to crime scenes for a real-time co-ordination of news, snuff, triage and firefighter teams.

Noting that script kiddies often die soon after relaying a signal via the Serco tags.

McConnell may title his next book: “Serco’s Innholders – Lord Thurso’s List,” as it appears the 1963 movie “The List of Adrian Messenger” may have been the template for these ongoing murders.

McConnell notes that Serco (formerly RCA GB 1928) and the MI-3 Innholders used Bermuda’s Fairmont Hamilton Princess as a honeypot hotel during WWII and while the Internet term script kiddie is new, the profiles of triaged victims and black-hat and white-hat hackers are unchanged:

Royal Hawaiian Hotel and the triage of Pearl Harbor
Lawrence Hotel and the triage of JFK
Hôtel des Mille Collines and the triage of Tutsis during the Rwanda Genocide
Hôtel Ritz Paris and the triage of Princess Di
Marriott World Trade Center and the triage of guests of The 9/11 Hotel Sheraton Pentagon City Hotel and the 9/11 triage on the Pentagon Lawn
Edgeware Road Hilton Hotel and the 7/7 triage of Mohammad Sidique Khan
Abbott Gardens Hotel, Pakistan and the triage of Osama bin Laden
Hotel Inter-Continental Kabul and the triage of Seal Team 6
Charlesmark Hotel and the triage at the Boston Marathon
Tibesti Hotel and the 9/11/2012 triage of Ambassador Stevens in Benghazi Residence Inn (Marriott) and the triage of Aaron Alexis in the Navy Yard
Holiday Inn Glasgow and the triage of police helicopter crash on Clutha pub
Regent Grand Hotel Bordeaux and the triage of Kok Lam’s Brilliant helicopter
Twin Cities Aloft and Jazeera Palace Hotel and the triage in the Michelangelo Towers!


MI-3B = Livery Company patent-pool supply-chain users of Privy Purse and Forfeiture Fund Marcy (Forfeiture Fund – KPMG Small Business Loan Auction – Con Air Medical JABS)
+ Inkster (Privy Purse – KPMG tax shelter – RCMP Wandering Persons – Loss Adjuster fraud)
+ Interpol (Berlin ‘41-‘45 – Operation Paperclip Foreign Fugitive – William Higgitt – Entrust)
+ Intrepid (William Stephenson – GAPAN, Mariners patent pools – Wild Bill Pearl Harbor 9/11) +Baginski (Serco Information Technologists Skynet sodomite mesh, KPMG Consulting Tillman)

MI-3 = Marine Interruption Intelligence and Investigation unit set up in 1987 to destroy above

McConnell’s Book 12 shows agents in his Marine Interruption, Intelligence and Investigations (MI-3) group mingling in various OODA exit modes with agents of the Marcy Inkster Interpol Intrepid (MI-3) Livery protection racket based at Skinners’ Hall, Dowgate Hill.

Prequel 1: #1809: Marine Links Clinton Yellen SBA Women to MI-3 War Rooms, Serco Base One Pentagon Bomb

Prequel 2: #1394 Marine Links Sister to Front-Running Nightwatch Serco Clock and Naudet Brothers Killisecond Shots

By Leslie Raphael
18 March 2006

At 8.46 a.m. on September 11, 2001, at the intersection of Church and Lispenard Streets in Manhattan, one of two French film-making brothers, 28-year-old Jules Naudet was filming a group of firemen from Ladder 1/Engine 7 at 100 Duane Street [Neighbor of 130 Duane Street Hotel], checking for an alleged suspected gas leak, when he captured what was thought to be unique film of American Airlines Flight 11 from Boston flying into the north tower of the World Trade Center, three quarters of a mile away. 

Two years later — the delay is still not satisfactorily explained — a Czech immigrant called Pavel Hlava produced his own video film of the event, shot from south-east of the tower and much further away, at the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel. Naudet's film, with its almost straight-ahead view of the plane hitting the tower, is still in many ways unique, and far superior to the "new" film. Naudet claims his film exists only because of pure luck — as would seem to be logical, given that this was the first attack of the whole "9/11" sequence, and was totally unexpected.

When United Airlines Flight 175 flew into the south tower twenty minutes later, it was captured by several photographers - including Jules Naudet's brother Gédéon - who were filming the aftermath of the attack on its neighbor, but who had not, of course, filmed that attack itself. After the first attack, the second one was easy to film — but how else could the first one have been captured than by luck? 

There is an answer to that question, but an extremely disturbing one. I believe the Naudet film of Flight 11 is a charade, staged to appear accidental. However bizarre that claim may appear to be, the evidence that justifies it is there in the film (the DVD version, issued in September 2002, titled "9/11 — The Filmmakers' Commemorative Edition"), and I challenge anyone watching it and following my arguments to reach any other conclusion. No-one can dispute that this is an extraordinary piece of film — because of its uniqueness as well as its content — and that there must therefore be an equally extraordinary explanation for how it came to be captured. I believe, for the reasons in this essay, that those who had both the motive and the effrontery to carry out these attacks also had the motive and effrontery to film the first one for propaganda purposes, passing it off as the product of luck, complete with a contrived cover story, the one told in the Naudet film.

What's wrong with this picture? On 9/11 at about 8.45 am, with the first plane still miles away. Spot the firemen, as invisible as the alleged gas leak; the real subject being where it usually is - in the centre, as in "World Trade."

The second plane would have been filmed anyway, but having "accidental" film of the first one as well was obviously too good to resist. It was too important an event not to somehow record on film and, with the help of professionals from the industry, which has had a long and close relationship with the intelligence agencies, it would not be too difficult to disguise the fact that the scene was arranged — the film equivalent of the (long-outdated, but similar) steganographic technique of hiding a coded message in a microdot, where it would not even be suspected.

(The absence of film from the Pentagon that morning, where security surveillance appears — if only to the chronically credulous — to be limited to the one car park camera that allegedly got stills of the explosion, with the wrong date and time, must have some other explanation.)

Unfortunately — for them — the people behind this disguise operation were anything but professional, and it does not take a genius to deconstruct the whole thing, when the joins holding it together are so obvious, to anyone who can see not only what is in the film, but — just as important — what is not. Even the still photograph reproduced above raises questions. Where, for one example, in a Manhattan street scene at 8.45 am on a working Tuesday, is the moving traffic? The vehicles in the picture are all parked, and given that two of them belong to the Fire Department and are displaying emergency lights, it would be illegal to overtake them, or park behind them in the same block.

Anyone, professional or amateur, who has tried filming street scenes knows about the problems moving vehicles can cause, and that the best solution is filming when there are none — but that normally means waiting for traffic lights to change. Or, even better, the situation in the Naudet film — a junction blocked by authority of the Fire Department, whether traffic lights change or not; a trick not available, it has to be said, to most ordinary photographers — one so unusual, in fact, that it immediately attracts suspicion. Furthermore, this photographer is not only filming at an officially blocked junction, he is filming the firemen who blocked it, as their guest — a 28-year-old beginner, treated the way a documentary film legend like Fred Wiseman might be; the suspicions multiply.

At the scene of a potential emergency, a photographer without credentials from the Fire Department would have been told to stand well clear, along with other pedestrians: he would not get the kind of privileged access Naudet gets. And if the white mail van parked at the south-east corner in this film had been turning right up Lispenard Street, between Naudet and the north tower, just as the plane flew into it, not only — since he is in the middle of the road — would he have had to get out of the way rather fast, the plane's impact could not have been filmed. How very convenient that, at the appropriate time, the van was still parked at that corner, the only other vehicles that could have caused problems belonged to the Fire Department and Naudet's view of the tower was unimpeded by either vehicles or people — including the firemen, all conveniently standing well away from the film action to the south. 

How many firemen, precisely? According to Firehouse magazine (April 2002), three units responded to the gas leak call — Duane Street, Engine 6 from Beekman Street and Ladder 8 from North Moore Street — and James Hanlon's commentary tells us there were thirteen men on duty just at Duane Street alone that day, with only probationary Tony Benetatos left in charge of the firehouse when the call came in. There must have been at least twenty firemen at this intersection, yet no more than five are ever in shot at any one time. Where were the rest of them? They were all hiding behind Naudet, camera-shy?

And where were the police at this emergency roadblock? The First NYPD Precinct's HQ is at 16 Ericsson Place, just across West Broadway from Lispenard, and one block north of Ladder 8. Why did no-one contact the police? Why did the brothers choose Duane Street, out of the 224 firehouses in New York, or the 51 in Manhattan? Because their "old friend" James Hanlon worked in that one. How did they become "old friends"? We don’t know. How does Antonios "Tony" Benetatos fit into this? Because the brothers had followed the progress of 99 Fire Academy* students, decided Benetatos was the one they wanted and, explains Hanlon, "We got Tony assigned to my firehouse, one of the biggest in the city" (06:35 into the DVD).

* Based at Randall's Island in the East River - which, ironically, is hired out by the Fire Department as a film location (fire trucks and equipment also available).

How did they manage that - an ordinary firefighter and two French film-makers? We don't know. But it begins to look like the construction of a fiction. The Naudets linked to Hanlon and Duane Street - how, we don't know - linked to Benetatos - how, we don't know; but we can't have the film without the links.

Ironically — or not — Benetatos' mother, Rev. Patricia Ray Moore, a Presbyterian pastor, says she is convinced the Naudet film was scripted, and "I think it was my boss" - presumably a reference to the Lord God. I would agree about the scripting, but not the writer: I would suggest someone less exalted, possibly in the pay of some branch of the US Government.

How can I make such an outrageous accusation against public figures? Surely if the Naudet film was so obviously incriminating, it would have been exposed long before now, and all those behind the 9/11 plot would have been brought to justice? Why would those responsible even risk having public figures so openly involved in it? The short answer to that is that the Naudets are no longer public figures. Since the brothers were the honorees at the 2nd annual United Firefighters’ Association celebrity golf benefit at Lake Success on Long Island on 23 June 2003 (with Evander Holyfield, the late Jerry Orbach, Mayor Michael Bloomberg and others), Jules and Gédéon Naudet have effectively dropped off the radar. No film projects, no news, no interviews, no photographs.

The Emmy and Peabody laureates have gone back to obscurity — and the world of journalism seems not to have noticed, or cared. If these men are innocent, where are they? I am not responsible for anyone else's shortsightedness - or cowardice. To me, the case for the Naudet film being fraudulent stands on its merits: anyone applying an open, rational mind to the facts presented here should reach the same conclusions I did. And these are mostly facts: there is nothing speculative in my list of 69 conveniences in the Flight 11 shot - they are all purely factual observations. The speculation is in trying to construct an explanation for them - a perfectly valid exercise, as long as fact and conjecture are distinguished.

On that subject, I want to emphasize that this essay does not claim to be able to prove who was responsible for 9/11. The point of the exercise is to establish that the Naudet film must have been staged by people who knew about the attacks in advance: who those people might be is a different subject. I have my own ideas on that, but they have little or nothing to do with the Naudet film, other than observing that it seems rather unlikely that two French infidels would be working for a Muslim fundamentalist group - or that that group could penetrate and subvert the Fire Department of New York, which at some level seems to have been involved in the planning of 9/11 — and the Naudet film.  

If the film was staged, it strongly suggests that that planning must have been internal, but anything beyond that has to be guesswork, albeit educated. They wouldn't have done it if it was going to be simple to prove who they were: unless, of course, you buy the instant solution of the al-Qaeda confession — so much easier than having to animate the brain cells. Or maybe you prefer the Noam Chomsky argument: it must have involved hundreds of people. It would have leaked out — before it happened. So why doesn't that apply equally to al-Qaeda? Why did none of them talk? Zacarias Moussaoui was arrested before it happened: didhe talk? If twenty or thirty Muslim terrorists could pull it off, without leakage, why not twenty or thirty senior US military officers — who would be in a better position to do it, and under the constraints of military discipline?

For the record, my own opinion is that 9/11 was commissioned by that cliché of American politics — the military-industrial complex: the one Eisenhower warned us about — and he should have known — he was one of them; and that the lead role in organizing the attacks (and failing to respond to them) was played by the Pentagon, in particular the branch of the armed forces that took zero casualties when that building was hit — the US Air Force — in which formerly served General Richard Bowman "Star Wars" Myers, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs (until his retirement on 30 September 2005) and prime 9/11 suspect.”

PHILADELPHIA and GREENWICH, Conn., June 4 /PRNewswire/ -- Starwood Capital Group and Hersha Hospitality Management ("HHM") announced today that they have entered into an agreement that will provide Hersha the resources to expand its highly successful platform across the United States. The transaction brings together two of the best known names in the real estate and hotel sectors. Starwood Capital is one of the world's leading investment firms focused on real estate, having invested more than $24 billion in assets since its inception, while the privately held HHM is a leading third-party hotel management company operating more than 70 hotels in major metropolitan markets. Under the terms of the agreement, Starwood Capital has purchased a 49.9% stake in HHM, for an undisclosed amount.

The new partnership will seek to capitalize on the ongoing industry recovery by aggressively pursuing select-service and full-service hotel management opportunities on a national scale. In addition, the venture will also target strategic investments in turnaround and opportunistic select-service hotels throughout the country and full-service hotels in select suburban markets.

"We are very pleased to be partnering with HHM," said Barry Sternlicht, Chairman and CEO of Starwood Capital. "Over the years, we have built a close relationship with Hersha's leadership team and admire its best-in-class operating capabilities and ability to create value for the properties it manages. Starwood Capital will contribute capital, deal flow and enterprise-building resources to help leverage HHM's operating expertise across the country and across a broader spectrum of investments."

"Partnering HHM with Starwood Capital allows us to leverage the considerable strengths of both organizations," Naveen Kakarla, President and Chief Executive Officer of HHM said. "Barry Sternlicht and Starwood Capital Group have demonstrated keen judgment, innovative vision, and an unparalleled access to capital across several real estate cycles. HHM, I believe, has struck the fine balance between building a high quality multi-brand platform that is both scalable and process-oriented, while preserving a hands-on, entrepreneurial approach to managing hotels and projects."

HHM currently operates more than 70 hotels in metropolitan regions in Boston, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey,Philadelphia and Washington, D.C. The company provides turnkey management services for properties with leading brand affiliations, including Marriott, Hilton, Hyatt, Starwood and InterContinental Hotels Group and, for independent and boutique hotels [Duane Street Hotel]. The company's executive headquarters will remain in Philadelphia, PA and its operations and administrative headquarters will remain in Harrisburg, PA.

Starwood Capital Group is one of the world's leading private investment firms focused on real estate. In addition, Mr. Sternlicht is the founder of Starwood Hotels & Resorts, where he served as Chairman and CEO for nearly 10 years as the company grew into one of the world's leading hotel and leisure companies. Mr. Sternlicht also serves as the Chairman of Groupe du Louvre, which owns some the world's best-known luxury hotels, including the Crillon in Paris, and one of the world's largest budget hotel companies, Louvre Hotels, with more than 800 hotels across Europe. In addition, a controlled affiliate of Starwood Capital acquired Golden Tulip out of bankruptcy in 2009, adding a network of more than 230 hotels in almost 40 countries to its portfolio.

Starwood Capital Group

Starwood Capital Group is a private U.S. Based investment firm with a core focus on global real estate. Since the group's inception in 1991, the firm, through its various funds, has invested more than $24 billion in assets. Starwood employs approximately 150 people across 9 offices including Greenwich, San Francisco, Washington, D.C., Atlanta, London, Paris, Luxembourg, Mumbai and Tokyo. Starwood has invested in nearly every class of real estate on a global basis, including office, retail, multi-family, industrial, residential land, hotels, resorts, golf and senior housing assets. Starwood and its affiliates have successfully executed an investment strategy that includes building enterprises around core real estate portfolios in both the private and public markets and were responsible for the creation of Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, iStar Financial and Starwood Property Trust. Additional information about Starwood Capital may be found at

Hersha Hospitality Management

Hersha Hospitality Management operates more than 70 hotels in major metropolitan markets. The company provides turnkey management services, repositioning and renovation, and asset management services for properties across all hotel segments affiliated with Marriott, Hilton, Hyatt, Starwood and InterContinental Hotels Group and increasingly for independent boutique or lifestyle hotels. The company's clients include publicly traded companies, joint ventures, institutional real estate owners and private investors. Additional information about HHM may be found at

SOURCE Starwood Capital Group; Hersha Hospitality Management”


Etienne Sauret - WTC: The First 24 Hours - SoHo Terrace: 145 Avenue of the Americas - Exceptional WTC Footage = Foreknowledge?

Abel Danger Blog

1 comment:

  1. NEW YORK (AP) — A new Marriott in New York City is claiming to be the tallest single-use hotel building in North America.

    The Courtyard-Residence Inn Central Park is 750 feet (228.6 meters) high, according to Marriott spokeswoman Nina Herrera-Davila.

    The hotel opened Dec. 29 at 1717 Broadway at 54th Street. It's 68 stories tall, with 378 rooms in the Courtyard hotel and 261 suites in the Residence Inn. The term single use means there are no private residences or offices in the building. Nightly rack rates will run around $300, Herrera-Davila said.


Who's visiting Abel Danger
view a larger version of the map below at