Sunday, August 31, 2014

The Downing of MH17 – Is Israel Involved?

Source: Christopher Bollyn

Updated August 13, 2014
He [Pinhas Lavon] inspired and cultivated the negative adventuristic trend in the army and preached the doctrine that not the Arab countries but the Western Powers are the enemy, and the only way to deter them from their plots is through direct actions that will terrorize them.
[Shimon] Peres shares the same ideology [as Lavon]: he wants to frighten the West into supporting Israel’s aims. – Moshe Sharett, Israel’s Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, 1955
The evidence suggests that Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 was shot down by a fighter jet at 33,000 feet. Who could be behind such a dastardly plot? Is this a false-flag operation with a twist?

We know that members of the Israeli military led the violent overthrow of the elected government of Ukraine in February 2014, and we know that Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 was shot down while flying through the air traffic control region of Dnepropetrovsk, where the governor, Igor Kolomoisky, happens to be an Israeli billionaire involved in aviation companies. Furthermore, Yaron Mofaz, a relative of Shaul Mofaz, former chief of staff of the Israeli military, oddly took a photograph of the ill-fated Malaysian plane at the airport in Amsterdam shortly before it was shot down, which he then provided to Reuters.

IGOR KOLOMOISKY (2nd from left), the Israeli governor of Dnepropetrovsk, is a prominent supporter of Ukraine’s Jewish community and the president of the United Jewish Community of Ukraine.

He owns several airlines as well. MH17 was in the air traffic control region of Dnepropetrovsk when it was shot down. For reasons that have not been explained, MH17 was diverted from its normal route and instructed to fly across the war zone at a lower altitude of 33,000 feet by air traffic control of Dnepropetrovsk. 33,000 feet, or 10,000 meters, also happens to be the maximum service ceiling of the Su-25 aircraft. Is this the real reason MH17 was instructed to fly 2,000 feet lower than normal over eastern Ukraine?

Yaron Mofaz, a relative of the former Chief of Staff of the Israeli military, took this photo of MH17 before it left Amsterdam on its ill-fated flight over Ukraine. Mofaz works with a company that owns a similar Malaysia Airlines plane that has been kept in a hangar in Tel Aviv since November 2013. So, why did he take this photo?

Yaron Mofaz also happens to be a director of a Mofaz family company that works closely with a company in Florida that owns a former Malaysia Airlines airliner, virtually identical to the missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 and MH17. This Malaysian airliner, it just so happens, was sent to Israel in late 2013 where it was parked in a hangar in Tel Aviv. For these and other reasons, it is logical that we consider the possibility that the shooting down of MH17 was an Israeli false-flag operation with a twist. Therefore, the real question is not whether Israel was involved, but to what degree was Israel involved in the atrocity?

A “false-flag operation with a twist” is meant to convey the idea that the downing of MH17 may be a kind of double false-flag operation, i.e. a false-flag within a false-flag. As we know, the United States and its western allies accuse the separatist pro-Russian rebels in eastern Ukraine of downing the passenger airliner with a surface-to-air missile near Donetsk. To this date, however, no evidence has been provided to support this accusation, although the United States had a spy satellite over the area where the plane was shot down when it happened. If they have evidence to support their allegation, why have they not presented it?

The Russians, on the other hand, have presented evidence to support the scenario that the plane was shot down by a Ukrainian fighter jet, allegedly a Sukhoi Su-25. The Su-25 is a Soviet-era ground-support aircraft which the Israelis have modified and upgraded. The Israeli-modified Su-25 is called the “Scorpion” (the Su-25KM), and features advanced avionics with a modern “glass cockpit.” The “Scorpion” was produced in an Israeli–Georgian joint venture with the Tbilisi Aircraft Manufacturing (TAM) factory that produced the original Su-25. This joint venture project would suggest that the Israelis have a number of the modified Su-25KM planes that could be deployed in a false-flag operation.

ESSENTIAL EVIDENCE – Ukrainian Su-25 Fighter Detected in Close
Approach to MH17
 

The Russians have radar evidence that a Ukrainian Su-25 fighter approached the Malaysia Airlines plane before it disappeared from the radar screen. The real question is, who was flying the fighter(s) that appeared to be Ukrainian planes? Did they shoot down MH17?

The Israeli-modified Su-25KM is produced by Elbit of Israel and TAM, the original maker of the Su-25.

The Elbit logo can be seen on the side of this plane. Was a plane like this involved in the downing of MH17?

If the plane was shot down by a Ukrainian fighter jet at 33,000 feet and the anti-Kiev rebels have been wrongly blamed, then it would be a simple false-flag operation. If, however, this was a false-flag operation in which the plane was shot down by a third party, by Israelis for example, then we would have what I call a false-flag with a twist.

The Israelis would have several motives to shoot down MH17. Firstly, they may want to punish Malaysia for having set up the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission which, in November 2013, found the state of Israel guilty of genocide of the Palestinian people. Secondly, they may be seeking to punish Holland for the fact that the largest pension fund in the Netherlands decided earlier this year to withdraw all its investments from Israel’s five largest banks, because those banks have branches in the West Bank and are involved in financing the construction of illegal Jewish settlements on occupied territory.

There are some who might find this line of reasoning to be unfair to Israel, “the Jewish state” and “America’s best friend in the region.” To them, I would simply say: You do not understand the true nature of the Zionist beast. Israel operates like a gangster state that uses murder and intimidation to force nations to submit to its will. The Israelis would think that the downing of MH17 should be considered a message to the governments of Malaysia and the Netherlands, and that other nations would be wise to take note of what happens to countries that challenge Israel.

If Israel were a person, it would be a psychopathic serial killer on the loose. The psychopath who is a serial killer might appear to be a nice, intelligent, and civilized person – but that is only how he appears. When no one is looking, he murders people in cold blood and gets away with it, time after time. The fundamental problem with his worldview is that he believes that he is superior to other people and that their lives are worth nothing. This is exactly how the Jewish supremacists who rule Israel view non-Jews. This is what is taught in Jewish yeshivas where the anti-Christian Talmud is the doctrine and source of all knowledge.

The Zionist state of Israel engages in wars of aggression and commits genocidal war crimes and massacres in plain sight and gets away with it, time after time, decade after decade. Anyone who has studied the history of Zionism and followed the actions of the state of Israel over the decades knows this very well. The historical record is quite clear: the Zionist state was created by terrorism and deception, and that is how it operates to this day. Israel’s latest aggression against Gaza in which family homes, schools, hospitals, and mosques have been targeted shows that the Zionist state uses terrorism on a daily basis and has absolutely no respect for the lives of non-Jews.

Zionists have exploited “the Holocaust” myth to gain political power. Using “the Holocaust” as their shield, the Zionists have forced the international community to give Israel a free pass for its flagrant crimes. As a result, Israel has a permanent “Get Out of Jail Free” card. The failure to hold Israel accountable for its many egregious crimes, however, has facilitated the creation of a Frankenstein state that has now turned on those who fostered it. The so-called “Jewish state” has become a monster that commits atrocities in full view of the world – with impunity. Individual states and leaders are now afraid to criticize Israel because they don’t want to endanger their positions – or their nations.

In looking at the possibility of Israeli involvement in the downing of MH17, let’s start with the first question that should be asked about any such atrocity: Do any of the given explanations make sense?

It is quite obvious that it makes no sense whatsoever for the pro-Russian rebels to intentionally shoot down a Malaysian passenger plane. Furthermore, it doesn’t make any sense for the Ukrainians to shoot down the plane either. It is hard to believe that a Ukrainian military pilot would knowingly shoot down a passenger plane and commit an act of mass murder, especially with the awareness that their actions would be seen by radar on the ground in Russia and by satellites above them.

So, who might have shot MH17 down? To answer this question, we need to ask another: Who benefits from the atrocity? While it is quite clear that the United States and the western allies are trying to put the blame on the pro-Russia rebels, and by extension on Russia and Vladimir Putin, simply blaming the rebels and Russia without providing any evidence to prove their case suggests that they have no proof.

The anti-Russia faction in the United States and Europe is clearly trying to smear Russia and Putin with the blame. This faction is led by the Zionist Neo-Cons in the Obama administration, people like Victoria Nuland (Kagan), the U.S. Assistant Secretary of State who managed the violent putsch in Kiev in February. It should be noted that Arseniy Yatsenyuk, the person Nuland chose to be prime minister of the unelected government in Ukraine, abruptly resigned on July 24, 2014, one week after the downing of MH17. Was the shooting down of the airliner a bridge too far for Yatsenyuk? It certainly would appear so.

The anti-Russia faction in Washington is the Zionist War Agenda gang that dominates the Obama administration, as well as the governments of Britain, Canada, and the European member states of NATO. The supposed leaders of these nations are really just “administrators” serving their Zionist masters who put them in power. This is why these weak national “leaders” speak in unison, as if reading from the same script, in defending Israel’s genocidal aggression against Gaza – as Israel’s right to self-defense – while condemning Russia and applying sanctions for offenses it has not even committed.

This is the same group, completely controlled by Zionists, which seeks to exploit the MH17 atrocity to advance its agenda of war and conquest. Israel took advantage of the media attention on the MH17 atrocity and began its pre-planned ground offensive into Gaza on the day the plane was shot down. Was this just a coincidence – or part of an evil plan? The number of very significant Israeli connections to the shooting down of MH17 suggests that Israeli intelligence is involved in the crime.

While we cannot say with certainty that Israel was involved in the downing of MH17, we can say that it had both the motive and the capability to do so. This is certainly more than we can say for the pro-Russia rebels, who have neither. What is most telling is that the rebels were wrongly blamed for shooting down MH17, from the beginning, by the Zionist faction – the very people who have both the motive and capability to carry out such a false-flag atrocity.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

“America the Target: 9-11 and Israel’s History of False Flag Terrorism” by Christopher Bollyn, Solving 9-11, January 14, 2008
http://www.bollyn.com/america-the-target-9-11-and-the-history-of-false-flag-terrorism

“Evidence Is Now Conclusive: Two Ukrainian Government Fighter Jets Shot Down Malaysia Airlines MH17 – It was Not a ‘Buk’ Surface-to-Air Missile” by Eric Zuesse, GlobalResearch.ca, August 4, 2014
http://www.globalresearch.ca/evidence-is-now-conclusive-two-ukrainian-government-fighter-jets-shot-down-malaysian-airlines-mh17-it-was-not-a-buk-surface-to-air-missile/5394814

Ihor Kolomoyskyi, Wikipedia, August 9, 2014
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ihor_Kolomoyskyi

“Largest Dutch pension fund boycotts Israeli banks over settlement ties” by Barak Ravid, Ha’aretz, January 8, 2014
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.567548

“MH17 Brought Down by Air-to-Air Missile, Finished Off by 30mm Cannon, Experts Allege,” RIANovosti, August 6, 2014
http://en.ria.ru/military_news/20140806/191783761/MH17-Brought-Down-by-Air-to-Air-Missile-Finished-Off-by-30-mm.html

"Su-25KM Scorpion," YouTube.com, November 17, 2007
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAszf4XPTFo

“The Hallmarks of Zionist Atrocities: 9/11, Gaza, and Other Crimes” by Christopher Bollyn, August 6, 2014
http://www.bollyn.com/the-hallmarks-of-zionist-atrocities-911-gaza-and-other-crimes/

“Ukrainian Su-25 fighter detected in close approach to MH17 before crash – Moscow,” (Important video of Russian radar findings) RT.com, July 21, 2014
http://rt.com/news/174412-malaysia-plane-russia-ukraine/

“Upgraded Su-25KM Proposed by Elbit, TAM,” Defense-Update.com, August 9, 2014
http://defense-update.com/news/su25KM.htm http://www.bollyn.com/#article_14832

Further Information:

Are the Israelis Planning Another 9-11 Using the Missing Boeing 777?

Why Is a Twin of the Missing MH370 in a Hangar in Israel?

The MH370 Cover-Up: GA Telesis Fabricates Story of Missing Plane's Israeli Twin

The Israeli Photo of MH17 – Who Is Yaron Mofaz?

2 comments:

  1. Too much coincidence to be not true.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well written article, but I have some reservations: (1) Your article gives the impression that Israel may have acted on its own initiative, partly because of Malaysia's unflattering report on Israel, and that I find unlikely; (2) I see the U.S. as being in charge of these types of 'false flag' operations. If Israel was involved at all - and that is a big 'if' - then Israel would have been commissioned, by either the U.S. or the Kiev government; (3) I am inclined to hold Kiev responsible. Elements of the Kiev government were (in 2014) nationalist fanatics and wanted Ukrainian NATO membership because, historically, they hate Russia. To my mind, they have tried to draw NATO into the civil war by implicating Russia every which way they could, including the shooting down of MH-17. I don't see Israel necessarily involved in any of this; (3) But we agree that MH-17 appears to have been shot at (prior to being fatally damaged by a BUK surface-to-air missile, of which there is plenty of signs on the fuselage). There are physical signs that suggest that the cabin of MH-17 was subject to a jet fighter's machine gun fire, namely a photo of the starboard vertical metal frame of the pilot's seat with two large perfectly round holes in it that to me (not an expert) suggests holes caused by bullets rather than by the irregular-shaped shrapnel of a BUK; likewise there are similar holes in the fuselage around the cabin. It will be interesting to see how the Dutch investigation report will try explain these away; it may simply ignore this evidence; (4) Obama will claim that he was not directly involved, but the fact is that at the time of the destruction of MH-17, America were carrying out joint military exercises in Ukraine and over the Black Sea, and they had at least one spy satellite positioned over Ukraine. As far as we know, none of this had anything to do with Israel; the U.S. was in the driver's seat. Obama's silence in the face of Russia's radar data, and his unwillingness to provide any satellite/radar data of his own, is telling. Maybe Obama is not prepared to tell a barefaced lie; (5) Obama thought he'd get away with this 'false flag' operation. This testifies to his faith in the orchestrated bias of Western news agencies and mass media - blaming Putin; (6) As far as the question of Putin's possible involvement is concerned, my forensic question is: 'cui bono?' (who benefits?). Putin would have had nothing to gain by destroying MH-17 by either using the Russian army's or the rebel army's BUKs. As I read him, Putin wanted Ukraine to be a non-aligned buffer state between NATO and Russia's southern flank and he certainly did not want to do anything that might give NATO an excuse to intervene militarily as a result of the destruction of an international civilian aeroplane. It therefore seems very likely that, if the rebels had in their possession a captured BUK, Putin and the Kremlin would have told them in no uncertain terms not to aim at anything other than military targets; (7) The publication of the full Dutch investigation report will coincide with the exit of Obama as President - which is convenient for him. If anything comes of the planned group litigation by relatives of some of the MH-17 passengers, then Victoria Nuland, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, is the person that the Defence should cross-examine. She is a 'fixer' and a 'doer' (like Oliver North under Ronald Reagan), and in the hands of a good defence attorney her testimony will be replete with obfuscations and contradictions. But Obama will not be available for comment.

    ReplyDelete

Who's visiting Abel Danger
view a larger version of the map below at whos.amung.us

You Too can be a CAPTAIN SHERLOCK