Thursday, September 4, 2014

United States No Longer Has The Capacity To Be a World Leader - Lawyers Are Generating Policy On Terrorism? - The Corporate Veneer Is Very Thin - Weaponizing Technology - The Delusion That Business Will Bring Peace

Source: Channeling Reality

The Dysfunction of Functional Organization

After watching Mathew Olsen's appearance at Brookings Institute to talk about ISIS and Al Qaeda in Iraq, Syria and the Middle East, I'm now fully convinced that the United States no longer has the capacity to be a world leader. They are lacking the ethical, moral and intellectual integrity to be world leaders.

Mathew Olsen is the Director of the National Counter-Terrorism Center and he is a Harvard-trained lawyer. Somebody should tell these people that the corporate veneer is very thin and in the case of Mathew Olsen, it's completely transparent. You can sell me soap but you can't sell me international and domestic policy.

About a week ago, Henry Kissinger wrote an essay that was published by the Wall Street Journal. The title of the Essay: Henry Kissinger on the Assembly of a New World Order.

"The concept of order that has underpinned the modern era is in crisis."

That's the language of diplomacy. In the language of real people, the world is blowing up. Societies are in chaos, governments are failing, people are dying and governments no longer have the "ethical, moral and intellectual integrity" to be world leaders. They created this world crisis and they are not going to be able to fix it because the considerations of highest priority in their scheming are still in place - and in fact, they are the very ones who are setting world policy that is creating the crisis.

Very simply, the order that Kissinger speaks of - is efficient (corporate) management of regional territories based presumably on the theory that the world can be run on the principles of business and that if business runs the world, there will be peace. It doesn't get much more delusional than that.

To really understand all of this requires looking at the world - specifically the operation of countries from a functional point of view. Forget the diplomacy, politics and personalities. Look just at organization.

The U.S. and presumably their NATO allies organized the military command structure into regional units. In 1999, Admiral Dennis Blair took command of PACOM - Pacific Command. In 2001, there was a reprint of an article published by the Asian Wall Street Journal (1-19-2001 for those of you who focus on the numerology of globalists), that said that Blair was pushing for the formation of "security communities".

"Security Community" is a generalized term for anything and everything having to do with "a sense of security". It is the corporate-speak term for a functional consolidation of the "elements of security" which, in the words of Mathew Olsen - again in corporate-speak, is the cooperation of Intelligence, Military and Law Enforcement. In the real world where we simply say it like it is - Admiral Blair was pushing for the consolidation of police state power across national boundaries to create the global police state for the Pacific Region.

On September 12, 2001, NATO invoked Article 5 of the Washington Treaty that was signed in 1949. "An attack on one - is an attack on all". In 2002, Northern Command was established as a unified military command for North America. In 2005, the Security and Prosperity Partnership was signed by George W. Bush, Vincente Fox and Paul Martin of Canada. From the State Department website, the White House Fact Sheet:
Develop a common security strategy to further secure North America, focusing on:
Securing North America from external threats;
Preventing and responding to threats within North America;
and Streamlining the secure and efficient movement of legitimate and low-risk traffic across our shared borders.
Northern Command and the Security and Prosperity Partnership which come to us in the form of the Department of Homescam Security are the implementation of the global police state organization over the North American continent. Karl Marx called it Dialectic Materialism. In the language of real people, what it means is that when you combine forces across traditional boundaries (including borders), the management of those combined forces rises above the combined forces and the management structures that were sovereign and independent then answer to the higher authority. This is an absolute fact of organization regardless of the type of organization you are looking at.

Getting back to the Middle East. The confusion of who we are fighting and who we are supporting becomes clear in the context of the global agenda of creating regional "security communities". We trained the men we are fighting. We supplied weapons to the men we are fighting. The idea for the Middle East was the same as here and in the Pacific - first to create a cross-border, regional military command structure followed by organizing and incorporating the domestic police state structure - the background propaganda of which is to make the world safe for global commerce that in reality, brings prosperity only to a very few at the top of the corporate pyramids and most particularly for the technology corporations who are driving the agenda because control will be achieved through weaponized (computerized), regional control of critical infrastructure.

This strategy calls for elimination of borders as is the case for our southern border with Mexico. It's wide open. According to Mathew Olsen, U.S. policy in the Middle East is to provide humanitarian assistance especially between Iraq and Syria where the border has been erased and to provide protection for Americans in the area. This is the policy until they can "transition to government that is more inclusive" of the residents in the area and then they can build capacity and execute a political transformation.

At one point in the program, Mathew Olsen said that some of the terrorists have western passports. During the Q&A, a Fox reporter mentioned that a 2nd individual apparently captured as a foreign fighter, worked at the Minneapolis Airport. Another questioner asked about ISIS activity in the U.S. Olsen replied that there is no indication of terrorist cells operating in the U.S. I guess he hasn't seen this map:

A couple of months ago, I took a flight that had a several hour stopover at the Minneapolis Airport. To me, it looked like the entire operation of the airport was a foreign cell operating in U.S. I've never seen so many Middle Easterners in the U.S. and they were all working at the airport. And why would they all be working at the airport?

The next layer of the globalization strategy for corporate totalitarian control is in the domestic policy area of transportation hubs as global hubs - aka inland ports which are logical islands separate and apart from the jurisdiction in which they are situated. Our legislators have been very accommodating at opening up our country for terrorist occupation. The global hubs start out as intermodal commerce zones evolving into foreign trade zones and international ports of entry under the management of a fascist Board of Directors "partnered" with local officials who have been organized into regional structures across city and county jurisdictions. With the assistance of the ACLU, they become sanctuary cities tying the hands of local police to do anything about the foreign takeover - walking occupation of the international zones. And as we heard from Mathew Olsen, Director of National Counter-Terrorism Center, he sees no untoward activity in the U.S. If you hear nothing else in the program at Brookings, that alone should tell you the side of the fence he sits on.

Because the globalized system benefits only the very large corporations and in particular, the technology corporations that actually run the U.S. government, there are two tiers to the propaganda. The business tier concerning global hubs is about creating centers (communities) of innovation, global business, etc., etc., The propaganda messaging for people on the internet is sustainable communities - and "intentional communities" aka communes of special interest. Put the concepts of international transportation hubs with intentional communities - or, put another way, "communities of concentration" and the image is horrifying.

Recently, I got a link to a story about a Liberty Zone in Honduras. The video tells the story of concept. The location in Honduras makes it easy to see through the strategy. It's the same strategy that is being implemented in the U.S. but because the contrasts aren't so stark, it's not as easy to see here.

Arbeit macht Frei
Taking it a step further, you'll notice that in the video, the speaker talks about how one of the benefits to the residents of the Liberty Zones is that they become stakeholders in the governance of the zone. Outside the zone, they have no access to law and legal remedies to the social conditions in the country inside the zone - supposedly they do.

Carrying forward with the concept of the international zone at a transportation hub comprised of "communities of concentration" under a system of their own law - which in scholarly terms is called Reflexive Law. As Patrick Wood recently pointed out, you'll only find it discussed in scholarly journals and primarily only in German scholarly journals. In a nutshell, Reflexive Law is a system of "self-governance" - but it is not self-governance in the way we Americans think about it. Reflexive law is the legal doctrine that will underpin the international system of global commerce as conducted in the international transportation hubs.

The Liberty Zone in Honduras is a good example of Reflexive Law in practice outside the United States. Inside the United States, it became apparent in the Kelo Decision. That was the Supreme Court case that sanctioned the theft of private property by Phizer Pharmaceutical Company by finding that community benefit outweighed private property rights. Digging deeper into that story, it was discovered that Phizer obtained 24 acres of prime waterfront property for $10.00. They were given a ten year - 80% reduction in city real estate taxes and $3 million a year reduction in sales taxes related to construction costs. The point being that the organization of the corporate-city officials partnership as the sovereign governing authority over the international intermodal commerce zone in New London, CT, applied Reflexive Law to relieve private property owners of their property and the Supreme Court upheld their jurisdiction for it. The conditions for the Liberty Zone in Honduras and the Phizer Zone in New London were different, but the application of the doctrine of Reflexive Law operates the same.

Reinvention of Government

The above is a vertical slice of the New World Order strategy - global to local. What enabled the transformation of the U.S. government from an American government to a functional system of privatized corporate management, was the Reinvention of Government project carried out by the Clinton Administration between 1992 and 2000. Bill Clinton came into power through the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC). The DLC was an insurgency within the Democrat Party. The "Third Way" policies that Clinton implemented were the policies were the policies of the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI). The PPI was a creation of the founder of the DLC and the funding for it was provided by a Zionist mobster. And you can pick up the research from there.

Vicky Davis
September 4, 2014

Source: therearenosunglasses

What is the truth about ISIS?

September 3, 2014

A detainee appears before the Multinational Forces Review Committee. This is one of Camp Bucca’s programs that help detainees to reintegrate into Iraqi society. (Department of Defense photo/Pfc. Amie J. McMillan)

An instructor provides a mathematical lesson to detainees at the theater internment facility in Camp Bucca, Iraq. The class is part of the educational opportunities available to the detainees to help them get a better job and serve as an example for their community upon their release. (Department of Defense photo/Pfc. Amie J. McMillan)

What is the truth about ISIS?

Is it an ISIS/ISIS a pseudo-gang, working for the CIA, or is it merely a bi-product of the US/Saudi strategic union? There has not yet been another serious explanation put forth, other than this, to explain their meteoric rise to sudden terror stardom in 2014, when they were "being kept on life support" in mid-2012. Despite the non-serious explanations offered by some serious mis-informers to the contrary (State Dept, Al-Arabiya), "bank robberies, extortion and kidnapping” do not explain the sudden mobility, or capability to mount continual operations, by a small army of thousands of men, with an apparently limitless supply of modern weaponry, spread-out over 2-1/2 states (still working on Lebanon). Such an army could NOT exist without a state sponsor.

In trying to use the Internet as primary (only) source, we first learn that there are many questions that are nearly impossible to answer effectively there, because of the constant "scrubbing" (deleting) of information that is embarrassing to the owner of the Internet (USA), or to its minions. It is not even necessary to delete articles there to hide them, a simple extra space or extra letter in the title link will nullify all further links made back to the article of embarrassment.

In addition, researchers must rely upon Google Translate to unlock all articles in the foreign press, effectively turning most translations into gibberish. For an English researcher wanting to locate specific articles in Arabic, or other tongues, there is also that annoying foreigner habit of adding their own letters to words (words with multiple spellings), thus making a nearly impossible task even harder.

Nonetheless, I continue to pursue the origins of the "Islamic State" or the history of its leaders, looking for the smoking guns to tie the movable "false flag" to its state benefactors. From the evidence that still remains on the Web, I soon discovered that the ISIL leadership (photos and history below) has links to Iraqi internment Camp Bucca…but, this is a story with many holes.

By my own "guesstimate," ISIS is the result of a failed US Army behavioral modification program at Camp Bucca, Umm Qasr, Iraq, between 2007 and its closure in 2009.

If it is true that alleged ISIS leader "Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi" was ever in Camp Bucca then he went through the Camp 134 Process, subjecting him to a "behavior modification" process, part of a "proactive counterinsurgency strategy" for detention operations (according to Detention Operations, Behavior Modification, and Counterinsurgency, from the US ARMY COMBINED ARMS CENTER). If al-Baghdadi or other ISIS members were at Bucca, they were herded through a dividing process, which identified the "unreconcilable" insurgents, in order to sequester them away from the general population. "Moderates or former extremists moving toward moderation" were separated for special treatment intended turn them away from extremist beliefs, before "releas[ing] them to return to their homes as "moderate missiles of the mind." The mission at Bucca was to "modify the behavior of detainees so that when they reenter Iraqi society, they are no longer threats to the Iraqi government and coalition forces but rather agents of change for the future of Iraq."

Before pursuing the question of the truth about ISIS, we must ask whether this behavior modification process successful, or did it have an unanticipated opposite result? It seems pretty obvious from our perspective that graduates of the ISIS program went on to become the world's most notorious terrorist army, a grave threat to world peace? Was this the result of a failed overt detainee/prisoner strategy, or was this the intended result? Was the US Army training terrorists at Bucca, or did its proactive counterinsurgency strategy for detention operations to turn the prison system into "a legitimate arena for counterinsurgency actions" backfire miserably, producing a generation of terrorist-jihadis like the world has never seen?

Consider what follows to be "hole-filler" in that storyline, hopefully helping readers to link the terrorists back to their state sponsors.

US War Crimes Iraq - Camp Bucca Detainees

ISIS: Who is former Imam Abu Omar Al Baghdadi and the top ISIS leaders?

Saudi Al-Arabiya provided the graphic answer below (making the text automatically suspicious). Click on the photo or the Arabiya link to view readable text.–

1- Abu Bakr al-BaghdadiBUCCA
2- Abu Ayman al-IraqiBUCCA
3- Abu Ahmad al-Alwani
4- Abu Abdulrahman al-BilawiBUCCA
5- Haji BakrBUCCA
6- Abu Fatima al-Jaheishi

What is significant about Camp Bucca?

It was the primary site for an experimental US Army behavioral modification program, Task Force 134, “Detention Operations Process,” which got into detainees home and their lives, as well as reconditioning their heads.

DR AMI M. Angell–rehabilitation programme leader at Camp Bucca.
"I think our efforts were successful. In fact, so successful that three previous Al Qaeda operatives [see confirmation by Dr. Angell] went through all the programs, were released, and then returned to work the programs as civilians." (1)
"They were guided by a psychiatrist and art instructor nick named Picasso – once an Al-Qaeda operative and a detainee at Camp Bucca.” (2b)–["They discussed issues such as violence and Iraq's future, before expressing their feelings in art." ]
"The spare time led some to start radical religious classes so some moderate detainees were converted into extremists. 'When we came up with rehab programmes as a solution, the American military was very against it,…They didn't understand why we are spending money on rehab when we are going to leave the country eventually.' –"The Art of Rehabilitating Terrorists" (2)
"The rehab programme won the support of US Marine Major-General Douglas Stone. Initial funding was enough for 'religious rehabilitation' for only 30 detainees. She brought in well-respected imams to teach them about the Quran. 'We saw a thirst for education as the other detainees all wanted to know what the 30 learnt,' said Dr Angell.–[confirmation comes from former Bucca detainee Adel Jasim Mohammed.via Al Jazeera (below)--ed.] 'Because many of them were uneducated, those who went for the classes were shocked to learn that what they had thought of Islam was flawed. 'They didn't question what people told them and didn't even understand the reasons for many things, from washing hands and feet before prayers to why they pray.' (2a)
"They discussed issues such as violence and Iraq's future, before expressing their feelings in art. They were guided by a psychiatrist and art instructor nick named Picasso – once an Al-Qaeda operative and a detainee at Camp Bucca." (2b)
Through Dr. Angell's program, a "moderate" Imam was brought in to teach religious classes at "Bucca Freedom School." He was given a list of religiously inclined detainees and allowed to pick 10-12 to mentor closely, with allegedly moderate ideas. Those special students were allowed to hold religion classes for hundreds of students. For all we know, that list of religious trainees formed the basis for the "Islamic State." Again, intentional, or the biggest "cluster-fuck" of all time?

US Iraq jail an 'al-Qaeda school' - "Former inmates of Camp Bucca say military prison was training ground for extremism.

Adel Jasim Mohammed, a former detainee of Camp Bucca near Umm Qasr, said that US officials did nothing to stop radicals from indoctrinating young detainees at the camp.
"Extremists had freedom to educate the young detainees. I saw them giving courses using classroom boards on how to use explosives, weapons and how to become suicide bombers," Mohammed said.
"For the Americans we felt it was normal. They did not stop them [the radicals]."
In 2005, an extremist was sent to our camp. At first, Sunnis and Shias rejected his teachings. But we were told that he was imposed by the prison authority," he said.
"He stayed for a week and recruited 25 of the 34 detainees – they became extremists like him."
Was this visiting scholar of radical Islam the same man who now calls himself Emir of the self-declared "Caliphate"?

Abu Bakr Baghdadi allegedly took the helm of "Al Qaida In Iraq," after the death of the terrorist leader known as Abu Musab al-Zarqawi in June 2006

The combined real and fake histories of Abu Bakr Baghdadi paint a portrait of an Iraqi from Ramadi in Anbar Province, who was allegedly a scholar of Islam with a master's degree and a PhD in Islamic studies from University of Islamic Sciences in Baghdad. He was allegedly captured by American forces sometime in 2003, before allegedly being released to the Iraqis in 2004. All articles repeating the claim that Baghdadi was held at Camp Bucca until its closure, can be traced back to this article from The Daily Beast. There is no information to be found on the Internet to fill in the gaps about his his time with the Iraqis, revealing where (or even if) he was held, but we know for certain that the only known photo of the man whom the Western media call "al-Baghdadi" came from the Iraq Min. of Interior. We cannot know for certain that the man held and released by American forces back then is the same man who now calls himself “Caliph Ibrahim.”

How ten months at US run Camp Bucca in 2004 transformed Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi into a ruthless foe
"Many of us at Camp Bucca were concerned that instead of just holding detainees, we had created a pressure cooker for extremism."–James Skylar Gerrond, a former compound commander at Camp Bucca in 2006 and 2007
Critics of the facility say it had in effect become a terror training institute, run by resentful inmates under a strict interpretation of Islamic law.
"It is al-Qa’ida central down there," said Sheikh Ali Hatem Suleiman, a tribal leader from Anbar province. "What better way to teach everyone how to become fanatical than put them all together for scant reason, then deprive them?"
[SEE: Behind the Scenes: Walking amid 2,000 al Qaeda suspects ]


[The Battle Behind the Wire–Rand Corp].

Reform School for Radicals, Marisa L. Porges July 1, 2011
To varying degrees, these initiatives also include religious education, from one-on-one meetings with local religious leaders who discuss ideological sources of radicalization to group sessions that review the Quran and Islamic law. In Iraq, the “Countering Extremism with Enlightenment", or Tanweer program, was modeled after early efforts in Saudi Arabia. Clerics and social workers led a religious dialogue to advance moderate views of Islam while promoting civic duties associated with Iraqi democracy.
US risks fanning violence as it opens gates of Iraqi detention camps – April 19, 2009

A former detainee entertains his daughter at being reunited with his family at Camp Cropper in western Baghdad, Aug. 9, 2009. Twenty-one detainees were greeted by their families while being released from the custody of coalition forces at the monthly Lion’s Dawn release ceremony.

On Aug. 19, 2009, a series of massive car-bombs announced the rebirth of AQI - Scores dead as Baghdad rocked by series of massive explosions

U.S. Military Closes Camp Bucca Prison in Iraq

Sept. 17, 2009, Camp Bucca Detention Center Closes in Iraq…thousands of inmates are set free in southern Iraq, near the Kuwaiti border.
"An Air Force C-17 carrying the last group of 180 detainees lifted off from the Basra airport headed to Camp Cropper."

The following is also taken from the July 22, 2008 al‐Qa`ida's Road In and Out of Iraq. Analysis from West Point expert on Iraq, Dr. Michael Knights–
AQI is a wounded organization...foreign fighters are now trying to leave the country."
That was Dr. Knights’ opinion on AQI in July 2008, the following is his assessment on July 31, 2012--
"The Sunni insurgencies (plural) are being kept on life support."
"It is clear that AQI has benefited from an unprecedented infusion of trained terrorist manpower. Many of the released persons spent time planning inside detention facilities like Camp Bucca and Camp Cropper, specifically so they could launch a smarter, stronger insurgent effort one day."
In this testimony by Dr. Knights before the House Foreign Affairs Committee on December 12, 2013 (SEE: The Resurgence of Al-Qaeda in Iraq), he referred to a previous article that he had written on February 24, 2012 for the West Point Center for Combating Terrorism (which has apparently been erased from the Internet, for some reason), called "Back with a vengeance: Al-Qaeda in Iraq rebounds." This article is cited frequently by researchers who search for the roots of “Islamic State." It described a spent organization, headed for the great dust bin of history, far different from the supercharged terrorist organization that is tearing across Iraq and Syria, as described in Knights' August 27, 2014 testimony (SEE: ISIL's Political-Military Power in Iraq).

The following excerpts come from that erased assessment –
"By the middle of 2010, Al-Qaeda in Iraq was dead on its feet. The organization suffered critical setbacks in late 2006 and early 2007 as Sunni Arab tribal militias – the Sahwa (Awakening) – turned against Al-Qaeda. In parallel the U.S.-led military effort protected the Sahwa and executed high-tempo remorseless counter-terrorism operations that ripped Al-Qaeda in Iraq to pieces. The group's foreign volunteers and money started to dry up. Al-Qaeda cells began to process of disintegrating into local criminal franchises that now kidnapped and extorted to pay their salaries rather than fund insurgency. In April 2010 Al-Qaeda in Iraq lost its two most senior leaders – AQI emir Abu Omar al-Baghdadi and war minister Abu Ayyub al-Masri – and stood in the verge of "disintegration" according to the US commander in Iraq, General Ray Odierno. In a press conference on June 4, 2010, Odierno noted: "Over the last 90 days or so, we've either picked up or killed 34 out of the top 42 Al-Qaeda in Iraq leaders."
"By early 2012 it was clear that the deaths of AQI's senior leaders were a watershed event that unfolded just as the movement sought to find a new way to operate in Iraq. Numerous processes have unfolded since Al-Qaeda's defeat in 2006-2009, including the release of large numbers of experienced militants from U.S. detention facilities, changes in the balance of foreign and Iraqi fighters within the movement, the withdrawal of U.S. forces, and determined attempts by Al-Qaeda in Iraq to learn from its mistakes. These changes crystallized in the year after the deaths of Abu Omar al-Baghdadi and Abu Ayyub al-Masri, culminating in a successful re-launch of the movement in April 2011 and a significant recovery of operational space within Iraq’s Sunni Arab communities. The movement appears to have rationalized its near-term objectives and synchronized its propaganda with the mounting concerns of Iraq’s Sunni Arabs."

Members of the Islamic State of Iraq terrorist group and the Levant (EIIL) affiliated to Al-Qaeda, captured in Iraq, confessed to having direct links with the government of Saudi Arabia.


Majid al-Majid was Saudi chief of the Ab.Azzam Brigades in Lebanon until his arrest and death in custody of Lebanon's Army.

"Funding for the Sunni insurgency comes from private individuals within Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States.”–Iraq Study Group Report

al‐Qa`ida's Road In and Out of Iraq,
"Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Egypt were the source of most of the foreign fighters detained in Camp Bucca, Iraq….As of April 7, 2008, the United States was holding 251 foreign fighters at Camp Bucca, Iraq. Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Syria each contributed 19 percent of those fighters. Libyans comprise only 3 percent."
"Foreign Fighters contributed approximately 75 Percent of suicide bombers between August 2006 and August 2007."
"The plurality of suicide bombers entering Iraq between August 2006 and August 2007 were Saudi."]
"Sheikh Abdullah Rashid al-Baghdadi” was installed as head of Mujahideen Shura Council, the precursor of "Islamic State" in January of 2006. Was this the same man as Abu Bakr Baghdadi, even though he was supposedly incarcerated at Bucca at the time? Abdullah Azzam Brigades was spun-off from AQI in the process. A precursor to Al Nusra Front, "Al Nusra wal Jihad fi Bilad al Sham" split-off from AbAzzam in 2005, taking initial credit for the assassination of Rafik Hariri.

Lebanese officials say Beirut suicide bomber, his accomplice are Saudi citizens

Atrash Investigation: Two Saudi Suicide Bombers on the Loose


Why is it that no researchers have asked the question "How did AQI suddenly acquire enough money and equipment to turn a failing terrorist entity into an "Islamic Caliphate" overnight?" Even if they did bully the Free Syrian Army and take their weapons, pull-off a "string of bank robberies," kidnappings and extortion, AQI could never have come up with enough cash to run an army, or to buy a fleet of shiny new Toyota trucks, or to become one of the best-paying employers in the Middle East, without being on some state’s payroll.

Further reading:

How America Made ISIS Their Videos and Ours, Their “Caliphate” and Ours


  1. ambassador for ChristSeptember 4, 2014 at 2:24 PM

    Isaiah chapter sixty six and verse four says:(isaiah 66:4) I also will choose their delusions, and will bring their fears upon them; because when I called, none did answer; when I spake, they did not hear: but they did evil before mine eyes, and chose [that] in which I delighted not.

    2Thess 2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
    2Thess 2:12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

    If people want to argue with the Creator God, The Almighty God, the King of Kings and the LORD of Lords, then speak to him. These are his words.

  2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.


Who's visiting Abel Danger
view a larger version of the map below at