The Refugee Weapons System
In the Shadows of the Zone
At some point while researching the redesign of our government with for-profit corporations leading the effort in a "partnership" with government, these thoughts occurred to me:
Government can do anything authorized by law
Corporations and non-profits can do anything not prohibited by law
If you have "partnerships" between government and private organizations – whether profit or non-profit, there is no limit to what they can do together. The result is fascism and that leads to a totalitarian state as the private organizations gain power to influence policy in their own self-interest and they seek to hold that power at all costs.
With that as a backdrop, I spoke with Tom Shanahan, Public Information Officer with the Idaho State Department of Health and Welfare today. What I found out is that the Idaho District Health Offices are "independent agencies" which means they are private organizations. They are not part of the state.
They are a creation of regional county associations. Their budget is somewhere in the vicinity of $90 million with all of it provided by HHS except for about $6 million that is provided by the state.
They contract with the state and federal government to provide services. It wasn’t quite clear how the money flows – whether the state gets the money from the FEDS and passes it though to the Districts or if the Districts get the money directly. It doesn’t much matter. It only matters to know that they are private organizations that by all appearances were divisions of the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare.
Mountain States Group
The Mountain States Group is a private social services company. On their front page, they list their mission as "Community Resource Development". They contract with both the state and the federal government to provide social services. On their 2010-990 form, they list their mission as being "to improve the delivery accessibility, and quality of health care and social services". In other words they are socialist changes agents hired by the federal government through grant programs. Recall what I said above about the law being the limits on government power coupled with the virtually unlimited power of a private organization because the "partnership" between Mountain States Group and our state and federal governments is a classic example. They have no real private sector customers – they work for the government in a corporate capacity.
Time out for a detour...
Mountain States went into business in 1974 and in 1975, Idaho Governor John Evans cooperated in the federal government’s request to help resettle the first wave of boat people from Viet Nam.
The impression given to the people of this country (because I remember) was that taking the people from Viet Nam was a one-time deal – because they were allegedly helping us to fight communism. Some forty years later, I realize now what a BIG LIE – and a joke that was. It's the City of London that are the Communists – "Commonists" as they should be called. They've been at war with the United States since the Revolutionary War. It never ended and it will never end. (Is it too late for a blitzkreig?) Note that I said specifically, the City of London – and not the UK. The City of London is first "Trojan Triangle" aka "Logical Island" after Rome. The concept of the logical island which was imported to this country from the City of London first in the form of the Foreign Trade Zone then building on the concept with the Enterprise Zone and Intermodal Commerce Zone – and ultimately, international port both sea and inland.
A 1945 article published by Foreign Affairs titled The British Commonwealth As a Great Power
First, what is the Great Power with which we have to deal? Is it Britain, or the British Commonwealth? .... Or if the Great Power is not Britain but the British Commonwealth of Nations, just what is this Commonwealth? .... How the British Commonwealth will fit into the regional security arrangements provided for in Chapter VIII, Section C, of the Dumbarton Oaks proposals is not yet clear. It has long been a cardinal principle of the members of the British Commonwealth that it forms a true regional security organization. Its states were built by seaward expansion, its roads are the sea, and now also the far more direct ways of the air. It has been built up historically by an expansion of peoples, covering exactly the same span of time and fully comparable to that of the two great land federations, the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The landward expansion of these last two peoples produced great federal states; whereas the seaward expansion of Britain produced a unique international family system which in the great recurring crises of history has shown no less solidarity and an equal patriotism. Mr. Curtin said on May 4 last year that "the British Commonwealth has shown itself as the most effective structure for regional security the world has ever known and it is in every country's interest and in the interest of any general security scheme that that structure should be maintained and, if possible, strengthened." This is entirely compatible with local regional consolidation in the South Seas under the Australian-New Zealand.So why would I make a big deal about the British Commonwealth of Nations? Because they inserted themselves into the "reinvention" of our government – via Canada. This was documented in The Jigsaw Puzzle – Part 8 of the documentation on the Reinvention of Government.
With the assistance of traitors in our own government, an almost perfect pincer movement was executed for a coup d'etat on our government. First, there was the "domestic terrorism" which resulted in the Clinton Initiatives for 'protection of the infrastructure' the elements of which are the technologically enabled police state – fusion centers and surveillance. The "privatization of government" combined with the treaty that created the World Trade Organization – "free movement of goods and trade in services" with national treatment given to foreign firms... combined with the treason of Harris Miller, an immigration attorney involved with writing immigration law, working with the Indians (India is a Commonwealth country) to ready them for H-1B importation of "services" – taking jobs away from American IT people... plus the icing on the cake, Harris Miller as the CEO of the Information Technology Associates of America being selected to be the sector-leader for the critical infrastructure protection initiative.... and within a few years... America is no longer America. And skipping ahead a bit, Boise, Idaho is being swarmed by Communists with Twin Falls running a close second – by contract.
Directory of Idaho Human Relations Groups, 2007
And the refugee resettlement program combined with the EB-5 visa program plus the aiding and abetting of illegals constitutes a stealth occupation and takeover of Idaho. And if saying that gets me killed... then so be it. At least you will know why.
October 7, 1014
Written testimony of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Refugee, Asylum & International Operations Directorate Refugee Affairs Division Chief Barbara Strack for a House Committee on Homeland Security, Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence hearing titled "Terrorist Exploitation of Refugee Programs"
US Catholic Bishops to Receive $4 Million Federal Grant for Legal Aid to Unaccompanied Illegal Minors
4 Oct 2014
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is funneling $4 million over the next two years to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops' (USCCB) Office of Refugee Resettlement to provide legal representation for 2,600 unaccompanied illegal minors.
"I think it's a recognition that many of these children have valid protection claims and they need legal representation," Kevin Appleby of the USCCB told MSNBC. "It is a result of advocacy and raising awareness about why these children are coming and why they're fleeing."
As Breitbart News reported Wednesday, a grant in a similar amount will be provided to the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants also to pay for legal services for unaccompanied illegal minors.
The U.S. Catholic Bishops' Migration and Refugee Services (MRS) states that it is "the largest resettlement agency in the United States."
According to the MRS's most recent annual report, "Upwards of 90,000" young illegal immigrants were projected to arrive between October 1, 2013, and September 30, 2014.
Additionally, MRS showed a total budget of approximately $71 million, of which nearly $66 million – or about 93% – has come from federal grants and contracts.
Because the USCCB accepts federal contracts and funding, it may be subject to federal laws and, especially in the case of President Barack Obama, executive orders, that may conflict with Catholic teaching and from which there is no exemption.
For example, as Breitbart News reported in July, a recent statement from the USCCB asserted that Obama's executive order barring federal contract recipients from any form of discrimination against LGBT employees "should be opposed."
"As a result, even contractors that disregard sexual inclination in employment face the possibility of exclusion from federal contracting if their employment policies or practices reflect religious or moral objections to extramarital sexual conduct," the bishops said, and added that the executive order "also needlessly prefers conflict and exclusion over coexistence and cooperation."
Nevertheless, the bishops show no inclination to address whether they should be "coexisting" and "cooperating" with the federal government in the first place.
Phil Lawler, editor of Catholic World News (CWN), seemed to think the bishops' call to "oppose" the executive order was unrealistic.
"[T]here is no point in a lobbying campaign,” he writes. "Maybe the bishops could organize a letter-writing campaign, hoping to change the President's mind, but anyone who has been watching this show for the past six years realizes that would be a waste of time and energy."
Lawler suggested instead that the bishops simply stop taking federal contracts.
"President Obama doesn’t want help from the Catholic Church. Say it's a deal; don’t give him any."
The bishops, however, have a history of "coexisting" and “cooperating” with the government.
In November of last year, Breitbart News reported that the bishops' MRS had revised and expanded its training to workers in federally funded refugee resettlement programs to “address the needs of particularly vulnerable groups of children, including youth who may be gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgendered."
Updated Bridging Refugee Youth and Children's Services (BRYCS) training manuals, published by the USCCB and funded with a grant from HHS, advise staff members on how to be sensitive to the sexual needs of LGBT young migrants while they make "no reference to moral law or the practice of virtue," as CWN observed.
"Imagine the chaos that would ensue if 'the largest resettlement agency in the United States' – the bishops' MRS office – withdrew from that effort," Lawler wrote. "For decades, some concerned Catholics have warned that by accepting (and, more important, energetically lobbying for) government support, Catholic charities have compromised their independence. President Obama has now illustrated that point."
Given that, from its annual report, the bishops' MRS program would shrink down to almost nothing without federal grants, Lawler concluded, “What would be left would be a recognizably Catholic charity, not a federal program administered through the bishops’ conference.”
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) was critical of the Obama administration’s move to award the grants by circumventing Congress.
"To end the surge at the border, the Obama administration should instead focus its efforts on deterring future border crossers and enforcing the laws against illegal entry into the United States," Goodlatte said. "Without such actions, the flood of people attempting to cross the border illegally will only continue."
Additionally, some members of Congress said the move by the Obama administration is illegal, and pointed to provisions in federal law that say aliens going through immigration proceedings can hire lawyers "at no expense to the government."
Analysts at the Congressional Research Service, however, observed that no court has accepted that argument, and claimed the language means that while immigrants are not entitled to a government-sponsored lawyer, the administration is not barred from making one available to them.