Saturday, October 11, 2014

Ebola, Scurvy, and Vitamin C

Ebola: Manufactured disease by U.S. Federal Government

Source: Freedom Files

By Lord Howard Hurts
October 8, 2014

Louis Farrakhan, the leader of the Nation of Islam, wrote this a few days ago: "Another method is disease infection through bioweapons such as Ebola and AIDS, which are race-targeting weapons. There is a weapon that can be put in a room where there are Black and White people, and it will kill only the Black and spare the White, because it is a genotype weapon that is designed for your genes, for your race, for your kind." In essence, Mr. Farrakhan said that the U.S. Federal Government is behind the Ebola virus outbreak. Mr. Farrakhan is incorrect, as is usual, in many respects dealing with the issue of the Ebola virus, but he is correct about Ebola being a 'manufactured' disease by the U.S. Federal Government. Here is the true story about the Ebola virus.

There are three types of internal hemorrhaging viruses in the world today. The main one – and it impacts more than 500,000 Africans, in Central and sub-Saharan Africa – is the Lassa fever virus. This virus is responsible for death in about 20% of those who are infected, and it was 'discovered' in 1969 when two missionary nurses died from this disease. This disease had been around for many years, but it was not defined as a specific type of virus, as the world did not care about 'fever deaths' in the African population. This virus, Lassa, is transmitted by way of rat urine or feces; once in the human body, it can be further transmitted by bodily fluids – which also complicates the situation, because then it can become an airborne disease (so far, it seems that it cannot be transmitted by insect bites, but this is not confirmed).

The second internal hemorrhaging virus is called the Marburg virus. It was first recognized in 1967 when, strangely enough, there were simultaneously outbreaks at research laboratories in Marburg, and Frankfurt, Germany. This virus was thought to have be brought to these laboratories by way of monkeys from Uganda. This outbreak of the virus was contained and not heard about again until sometime in 1974.

Strangely enough – that is, if you believe that the world is flat – in 1976, after the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) built a bioweapons laboratory in Kenema, Sierra Leona, Africa, the Ebola virus suddenly came into being. This 'newly discovered' internal hemorrhaging virus was the 'bomb'. It was developed with the covert aid of Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana. The USAMRIID is always looking for some type of weaponry with which to inflict death and destruction on an enemy, and this new Ebola virus seemed the perfect weapon of war. Then, as often happens with that type of research and development, the virus 'escaped' and suddenly was a threat to an unsuspecting African population, and ultimately to the populations of the world.

The world is now told that this Ebola virus is a 'natural mutation', when in fact it is a completely manufactured mutation of the Lassa fever virus. The world is also told that there is no current cure for this virus, when in fact there is a quite inexpensive treatment available, but it is not some patented drug owned by a big pharmaceutical company. And because this treatment is not something that a big pharmaceutical company can use to 'rake in' excessive profits, this cure is relegated to the 'back pages' of the Internet. So let me give you the information that you might need, should this Ebola virus outbreak not be controlled and you become infected.

Vitamin C is a proven killer of all known viruses. Vitamin C is cheap and makes little money for big pharmaceutical companies. Thus, these companies do no research on this lowly vitamin. Now please do not misunderstand me. If one is afflicted by the Ebola virus, taking a few vitamin C tablets at home will not help. It takes massive doses of this vitamin, and it must be administered and watched by professional health providers. The dose must be so large as to be on the edge of giving the patient diarrhea... a condition that would make the patient worse. The amount of vitamin C must be closely regulated, and this takes responsible professional health providers. All of the internal hemorrhaging viruses – Lassa fever, Marburg, and Ebola – are mutations of the common disease named scurvy.

Scurvy is something that plagued sailors in times past, as they traveled on long voyages without foods that provided the body with vitamin C. Scurvy 'works' by devouring the body's vitamin C supply, and vitamin C is needed for blood clotting. Scurvy and these hemorrhaging diseases are effective killers because vitamin C is water soluble and must be replaced in the human body each day. And this is the reason scurvy and these internal hemorrhaging viruses need massive amounts of vitamin C for the patient to make a recovery. It must also be noted that only humans and non-human primates need a daily intake of vitamin C, because almost all other mammals produce their own supply of vitamin C internally. And it was physician James Lind who discovered the relationship between citrus fruits and vitamin C, and brought the demise of this common sailors' disease, scurvy, in 1747 while a surgeon aboard a British naval ship (thus the reason that, even today, British sailors are referred to as limeys).

Vitamin C has been proved to kill every virus known to man. It does this by way of the formation of hydrogen peroxide in the body, that not only arrests viruses, but kills them along with any bacteria found in the blood. Now this being said, it seems to me that a more direct route for recovery from an internal hemorrhaging disease would be intravenous injections of food-grade hydrogen peroxide into the plagued body. Of course, such an inexpensive solution is not something that big pharmaceuticals are interested in, and our Federal Government is so corrupted that such an inexpensive solution would curtail their bribes and bullshit, and lessen their gaining monetary handouts from big pharmaceutical companies for their next election to public office.

So now, unfortunately, the world's populations must suffer from a disease that was created to kill and sicken in time of war by the USAMRIID (Fort Detrick, Maryland) and Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, when there is no declared war, or need for this wanton death and destruction.

"Vitamin C" – Can



Death doesn’t = someone’s opinion about death

by Jon Rappoport

October 8, 2014

“I saw people die of HIV.”

No. You saw people die. Doctors said they had HIV.

“I saw people die from Ebola.”

No you didn’t. You saw people die. You yourself have no idea what killed them. You can pretend you know, but you don’t.

“The doctors know what kills people.”

You win a gold star for your faith. You’re now a fully-fledged member of the Church of Biological Mysticism.

People who see other people die often assume they know why it happened. Certainly, when it comes to viruses, they don’t have a clue. They’re sure they know. That doesn’t make them right.

A parent’s healthy son returns from the doctor’s office, saying he just found out he’s HIV-positive. He tells his mother the doctor has put him on AZT. Three weeks later, the boy folds up, can’t get out of bed. He’s so weak he can hardly move. The doctor says, “HIV has spiraled out of control. It’s full-blown AIDS. He must continue taking his AZT.” Three months later, the boy is dead.

The mother says, “My son died of HIV.”

Does she know that AZT, a failed chemotherapy drug, was taken off the shelf for AIDS patients, and that it mercilessly attack all cells of the body, including the immune-system cells?

Of course not.

As I’ve repeatedly pointed out over the past 27 years (starting with my first book, AIDS Inc., Scandal of the Century), covert medical ops will use death and dying to construct a false picture of the cause of death and dying.

They know this strategy works, because people, seeing death, will accept what the authorities tell them caused it.

I’ve often cited the groundbreaking review, “Is US health really the best in the world?” Author, Dr. Barbara Starfield, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. Publisher: The Journal of the American Medical Association, July 26, 2000.

Starfield concluded that, every year in the US, the medical system directly kills 225,000 people. 106,000 die as a result of medicines the FDA has approved as safe. The other 119,000 die as a result of treatment in hospitals.

Add it up. That’s 2.25 million deaths per decade caused by the US medical system.

Now for the question: how many of those deaths… do you think doctors… voluntarily admit… to families of the dead patients… are medically caused?

I’ll tell you.

None.

In every case, a lie was cooked up. “I’m sorry, but the disease suddenly accelerated…”

That’s 2.25 million lies per decade about the actual cause of death.

But people continue to worship at the feet of doctors and medical experts.

If a doctor says a patient died of virus VCX-2QK-89tf, a supposed thing the mother of the patient will never see and never have a chance of seeing… and if the doctor says he knows the patient had the virus because a diagnostic test was run on the patient… the mother will believe the doctor… even though she has absolutely no idea what kind of diagnostic test was run or whether it is accurate or even relevant.

“I saw my son die of the virus.”

She didn’t. But she’ll believe it. We can understand why she believes it.

But that doesn’t affect our judgment when we look into a virus and investigate whether it is real, whether it actually causes disease, and whether the diagnostic tests for the virus tell a true story.

When you have hundreds of millions of people who assert that Ebola is killing people, you’re looking at faith.

Blind faith in authorities who don’t deserve it.

You’re looking at the construction of reality, which is then sold.

Take this example: a farming village in Liberia, one of the so-called epicenters of Ebola. The families manage to produce enough to get by. They live downstream from a giant Firestone rubber plantation.

For years, to no avail, the people of the village have been protesting the runoff of noxious elements into their water supply. Fish are dying. Crops are failing. That means malnutrition, hunger.

That means chemical assault on their immune systems.

People are developing sores, lesions, fevers, respiratory problems, digestive problems, including diarrhea.

How easy is it to call this Ebola, in light of the current hysteria?

“Everyone knows” it’s Ebola. But it isn’t.

People are obsessed by the idea that a whole population, in a far-off nation, under the gun, must all be suffering from One Thing – in this case, a virus.

Splitting this apart into a number of different causes in different regions – contaminated water, open sewage, severe malnutrition, decimating wars, toxic vaccine campaigns, the vast overuse of antibiotics, industrial pollution – this doesn’t have the compelling ring of: “It’s a virus.”

So people say, “Forget about all that. We don’t want to know about it. We know it’s a virus.”

No they don’t.

http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/10/08/death-doesnt-someones-opinion-about-death/

Jon Rappoport - CDC Fraud: Vaccine Autism Link & Ebola (Red Ice Radio: September 26, 2014) Audio link (2:35:15) #Ebolagate #Vaccinegate

1 comment:

  1. Can anyone please explain how "All of the internal hemorrhaging viruses – Lassa fever, Marburg, and Ebola – are mutations of the common disease named scurvy".
    You see, what puzzles me is that viruses are external pathogens and so I cannot see how an original internal dysfunction such as a deficiency in diet could lead to the creation or development of pathogens, particularly something as complex and advanced as the ebola virus. For anyone not "in the know" regarding the level of complexity here, I will illustrate:
    The ebola virus has at centre an RNA genome strand that is "enveloped" within nucleoprotien tube. This "tube" has an incredibly complex function. Ribonucleoproteins (complexes of RNA (RiboNucleic Acid) and proteins) occur in all cells as part of the machinery for protein synthesis. This complex operation requires the participation of messenger RNAs (mRNAs), amino acyl transfer RNAs (tRNAs), and ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), each of which interacts with specific proteins to form functional complexes called polysomes, on which the synthesis of new proteins occurs. However, this is only part of the explanation of the complexity of the ebola virus since this incredibly complicated "envelope" is itself encased within another protien shell of vp40 and vp24 protiens both of which have additional (and again incredibly complex) functions. VP24 "functions" involve the formation of fully functional and infectious viral particles, promotion of filamentous nucleocapsid formation, mediation of host responses to infection, and suppression of the host innate immune system. VP40 "regulates" viral transcription (i.e. how viruses trick host cells into making copies of themselves), morphogenesis (the self-development of the shape and structure of a virus), packaging and budding of mature virions ("independant" virus particulates). VP40 goes through intermediate states of assembly and can act independently as suppressors of RNA silencing, indicating that the virus actively resists cellular RNAi during replication. The upshot of the latter point seemingly related to a form of viral "self defence mechanism", though correct me if I'm wrong on this point. Thus we have an extremely complex envelope "responsible" for viral formation, transcription, morphogenesis, packaging, budding and (possibly) self-defence plus the mediation of "appropriate" host responses and suppression that envelopes the shell "responsible" for the upkeep and maintenance of the virus' physical makeup (which, itself, envelops the actual RNA genome, i.e. genetic code or building-blocks that are the basis for that organism's basic structure and attributes). If this wasn't complex enough the virus also has an outer "Viral envelope" that serves several purposes such as protection of the inner parts of the more "functional" parts of the virus as well as means and methods to promote or execute infection of the host. The protective functions themselves can be extremely complex such as employing "stealth" camoflage in the form of changing or morphing of how the virus (chemically) appears to the host (in case the host "remembers" this particular virus) or by "wearing" some of the hosts cell membranes to avoid host immune responses as well as "wearing" glycoprotiens that assist the infection of the host by way of attachment in a manner that may mimic the host chemically so as to avoid triggering immune repsonese from the host.
    Now, how something unbelievably complex could be described as a mutation of a lack of vitamin C, or to put it conversely, how can a (albeit, profound) lack of vitamin C (resulting in metabolic dysfunction, due to the extent of the deficiency) "mutate" to form a proto-organism as complex as just described just beggars belief.

    ReplyDelete

Who's visiting Abel Danger
view a larger version of the map below at whos.amung.us

You Too can be a CAPTAIN SHERLOCK