Tuesday, November 18, 2014

#2174: Marine Links MH Flight 370 To Serco Boeing Waypoint Telemetry And Kaya Down Low Killing Chips

Plum City - (AbelDanger.net): United States Marine Field McConnell has linked Matthias Chang's limited-hangout video speculations on the disappearance of MH Flight 370 to Serco's development of ad-hoc waypoint telemetry for the Boeing Company and the Kaya Identity chips for contract killers allegedly hired by alumnae of the Down Low Club in Chicago.

Chang speaks about MH 370 flight [10:48-Boeing; 14:17-Katrina; 14:49-9/11; 16:05- Bin Laden, 20:57-Inmarsat;  24:43-Diego Garcia; 29:20-Exercise 9/11; 30:52-Exercise 7/7; 31:50- Amec Demolition Van;  32:47-Cope Tiger Cobra Gold Exercises for MH 270; 40:25-NSA Telemetry; 40:50-Murder; 41:18-Weapon; 46:32-CSI] 

"To this day, people in Chicago are still scared about being murdered for talking about Barack Obama being gay or about what goes on at Trinity United with the still-active "Down Low Club". Young, gay, black men are mentored into the club and are eventually paired up with often unattractive and difficult to deal with straight black women who never have boyfriends (since guys don't want to have anything to do with them). A friend of mine in the "Think Squad" of prominent black professionals I talk to regularly calls these women "heifers" and says it's very common for "cake boys" to be paired up with "heifers" so that "dummies are fooled" into thinking they are straight."

McConnell alleges that Serco launched the development of waypoint telemetry and killing chips after the Unabomb campaign orchestrated by his DOJ Con Air sister Kristine Marcy, failed to convince university and airline leaders of the merits of deindustrialization or depopulationism.

McConnell claims that Serco's hot air banker HSBC and its co-investors in the $92 trillion Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) helped finance Michelle Obama's 2008 election campaign for her husband because of her support for carbon savings associated with partial-birth abortion.

McConnell claims HSBC paid Barack Obama and David Archer at the University of Chicago to develop a Kaya Identity on-line calculator chip for Serco's Boeing waypoint telemetry to help the CDP track and kill citizens and support Down Low wag the dog stories such as Mr. Chang's.

"http://www.abeldanger.net/2014/03/the-list-of-innholder-thurso-wrist-that_30.html Mar 30, 2014 - G-Spot: MH370 + BUAP + FIELD MCCONNELL + SERCO .... engagement of AIRCIA™-system in event of natural-cause pilot-incapacitation, ... in light of MH370 and keep in mind that on 14 March, 2014 ALPA President Lee .... He checked his pocket calendar and selected 7pm 17 July, 2014 for the Victory ..."

McConnell notes that he offered to brief Matthias Chang and/or representatives of MAS and Malaysian government during a trip to Kuala Lumpur.  McConnell's trip to Kuala Lumpur was during 15 April to 21 April, 2014 and triggered, in part, by his prognostication of 30 March, 2014 [ see above and note date published ] where he suggested a second explosive event if the BUAP was not exposed after MH370's commandeering of 8 March, 2014.  The day following the capture of MH370 McConnell had published a YouTube "Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot" which suggested how Serco's alleged use of Boeing waypoint telemetry in both the electronic hijacking of MH 370 and the four planes which flew Down Low decoy and drone maneuvers for Snuff  Film 9/11 was accomplished.

McConnell alleges that HSBC funded Bob Coulling – Serco's in-house PFI sponsor – to set up the Airbus facility at Oakhanger so potential whistleblowers such as the Freescale employees on MH 370 could be tracked with the Kaya Identity Chip and snuffed at crime scenes pre-populated with tagged offenders to remove any evidence of a HSBC wag the hot-air dog snuff films.

McConnell alleges that Down Low Club alumna Michelle Obama extorted President Xi Jinping into an agreement to cut China's carbon emissions after showing him snuff films of the murders of the 8 Freescale employees who designed the Kaya killing chips for planes tracked through the Airbus Telemetry and Command Station at Oakhanger managed by Serco's Gary Butcher.

McConnell attributes the recent collapse in the value of the Serco share price and the resignation announcement of Serco chairman Alastair Lyons, to Abel Danger's exposure of Serco's hot-air telemetry tracking and the Down Low Club's Kaya killing chip both of which were integral elements of Civil Case 1:08-1600 (RMC) which was a lawsuit capable of exposing how 9/11 was accomplished, and by whom.

McConnell invites uncompromised individuals in the entities below to investigate Serco's Airbus Telemetry and Command Station Manager at Oakhanger, Gary Butcher, and the 32-year veteran PFI manager Bob Coulling and check the tradecraft needed in a hacking service to disappear MH 370 with Kaya killing chips, especially in electronic warfare, tagging, asset recovery and paedophile image analysis for MOD, GCHQ, CESG, Police, Home Office, Serious Organised Crime Agency, Ministry of Justice and Customs and Revenue and Immigration Service.

Prequel 1: #2173: Marine Links Serco Hot-Air Banker to Kaya Identity Death By Telemetry and MH370 Freescale Snuff

350 PPM CO2: Earth's Tipping Point? - Bill McKibben

Flash Crash Down Low Hack MH17

Serco... Would you like to know more?

"Background: This post computes the timing of the flight to confirm above hypothesis.


Hypothesis: Evidence indicates MH370 flew at cruise speeds (460 knots) navigating known waypoints for the entire flight after crossing the Isthmus of Malaysia until at least the 8:11 ping.

Waypoint path: IGARI VPG VAMPI SANOB RUNUT SCCI(Guess) Map There is potential that there was an intermediate waypoint between IGARI and VPG.

Timeline (places MH370 at IGARI waypoint at 1:21 MYT)
Malaysian Radar Trace (Shows waypoint track VPG VAMPI, then near MEKAR at 2:22 MYT)
Malaysian release of Inmarsat 450 knot flight solution and ping data (Shows "possible turn" at approximately 2:28 MYT; places MH370 on a series of concentric ping circles for duration off flight after the turn. Inmarsat published solutions of "example southern tracks" give clues as to ping circle radii, for which only the last one at 8:11MYT has been released)

Computations, etc.:

Simple spreadsheet of time vs. distance (see below for update)
Update: See latest post: 
Updates (newest at bottom)
Update: Markup of Malaysian radar trace. Compare to same area in Skymap
Update: Markup of Inmarsat 450 knot solution
Update: New Location, time distance spreadsheet with partial ping (possible engine flameout) and guesstimated crash site assuming additional 70 nm travel along course after flameout. 

Guesstimated crash site on Skymap; 1554 nm (2878 km) SW Perth.

Update: Assuming engine flameout at partial ping, total range at flameout (out of fuel) is estimated as 3493 nm or 6469 km. Compare to these estimates.

Update: Markup of estimated crash on search/buoy drift map. Just missed in early search due to drift? Path lines up well with early NTSB solution as shown. Flight could have gone further south, but Malaysia now indicates high fuel burn in South China Sea. Original source.

Update: Conflicting information whether partial ping could be engine flameout, plane in water (putting crash further north) or something else. Also, I have heard a 777 could be expected to glide for up to 150 km (80 nm), but have no citation, putting it further south. Until resolved, above crash site seems most likely.

Update: A good explanation of how speed relates to the Inmarsat Ping arcs. The poster is basically describing why the yellow and red Inmarsat solutions look like they do. The new shift in search area northward implies that speed was faster in the South China Sea Malaca Straight, but relatively slow in the Indian Ocean. Discussion. New search area lies between the red and yellow solutions at the 8:11 ping.

Update: Journalist recreates MH370 in flight simulator. Based on this, engine flameout seems terrifying and there is no "glide." Crash location could be closer to the partial ping.

Update: Reddit user posts that new search area appears to be within Jorn coverage.


MH370 moved relatively quickly (450 knots) between point of last ATC contact (IGARI) and Malaysian radar hit near MEKAR.

Malaysian radar pegs MH370 just south of MEKAR at 2:22 MYT while travelling VAMPI to SANOB. Malaysian radar clearly shows MH370 travelling VPG VAMPI SANOB

Inmarsat Burst Frequency Offset "Possible turn" correlates exactly with turn south at SANOB

Inmarsat 450 knot solution shows two slight breaks that correlate with intermediate pings and exactly with hypothesized flight path timing of MH370 travelling SANOB to RUNUT and beyond at about 460 knots. This is consistent with a single change of direction at SANOB RUNUT, because Inmarsat is drawing line segments between pings. There is only a single course adjustment at RUNUT.

There are three Inmarsat pings after RUNUT and the Inmarsat 450 knot solution shows them to be in straight course on their map. This is strongly indicative that MH370 is travelling to another waypoint.

Using SCCI as a guess of the last waypoint and 460 knots produces a location at the last full 8:11 ping ~2500 nm from the projected Inmarsat satellite location, indicating it fits the data.


Traveltime between IGARI and radar hit at MEKAR provides bounds on what could have happened. Malaysia could further refine by releasing time of first radar hit in addition to last.

Inmarsat could use this knowledge to reexamine their ping data and see if this hypothesis fits their intermediate ping data

Inmarsat in doing so could narrow the location of the crash site considerably using this as a potential solution, with 10 days remaining black box signal life.

Combined with a best estimate of fuel range, a lest estimate of crash location could be obtained along a single line.

Implications of a deliberately plotted course via waypoints can possibly help solve what happened."

"MH17 and MH370 flight controls were hacked. The planes' flight paths were diverted over restricted airspace and subsequently shot down.

Both MH17 and MH370 made abrupt changes in their flight paths. Both planes flew over restricted airspace. This was the work of hackers who have taken control of those planes. The 777 is especially vulnerable since it is completely computer controlled in all regards including flight controls.

You might ask that if hackers took control of the planes then why not just crash them immediately? They can't. The 777's software will not allow the planes to crash. If a hacker attempted to do so, the software would prevent the crash. The hackers' only option was to fly the planes over dangerous areas so that they would be shot down.

It is possible that both planes were from the same airline either because someone inside the airline gave passwords which allow access to the planes' controls or there is an online security vulnerability at Malaysia Airlines.

This is huge. Let's get this pinned, people."

"Serco Receives "Supplier of the Year" from Boeing for Enterprise Architecture Expertise

Reston, VA (PRWEB) May 19, 2011 Serco Inc., a provider of professional, technology, and management services to the federal government, has been recognized as Supplier of the Year by The Boeing Company in the Technology category for its state-of-the-practice Enterprise Architecture solutions. The Boeing Supplier of the Year award is the company's premier supplier honor, presented annually to its top suppliers in recognition of their commitment to excellence and customer satisfaction. This year's 16 winners represent an elite group among more than 17,525 active Boeing suppliers in nearly 52 countries around the world. This selection was based on stringent performance criteria for quality, delivery performance, cost, environmental initiatives, customer service and technical expertise. This is the second time Serco has been recognized as Supplier of the Year by Boeing. In January 2011, Serco also received the Boeing Performance Excellence Gold Award in recognition of the Company's performance excellence. 

"We are extremely honored to receive this recognition for our work in support of Boeing. This prestigious award demonstrates our passion for excellence and ability to apply Serco's Enterprise Architecture expertise across a broad range of applications," said Ed Casey, Chairman and CEO of Serco. "We continue to grow our EA practice, and over the past 15 years we have deployed solutions to support enterprises and systems across federal and commercial environments." 

Serco's Enterprise Architecture Center of Excellence is based in Colorado Springs, CO. The team provides a variety of services in support of Boeing's business units as well as research and development efforts. Serco's architecture employs object-oriented (OO)/Unified Modeling Language (UML) to define, design and satisfy defense agencies' mission-critical requirements, including Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (C4I). This approach improves system developer's understanding of operational requirements and how best to integrate enterprise operations and systems for the optimal fulfillment of C4I and other operational needs."

"Serco supported the AFSCN communications support squadron in partnering with military and government contractors to supervise an Air Force Satellite Control Network test effort at Oakhanger, United Kingdom. Their innovative test procedures and creative solutions provided a viable implementation plan designed to improve communications capability ..  The team's outstanding support and will bring new capabilities and enhanced services to our critical warfighting mission."
Maj Gen Dale W. Meyerrose, Air Force Space Command,Director of Communications and Information"

"The Stockholm Environment Institute defines a carbon offset as "a credit for negating or diminishing the impact of emitting a ton of carbon dioxide by paying someone else to absorb or avoid the release of a ton of CO2elsewhere".[16]

The University of Oxford Environmental Change Institute defines a carbon offset as "mechanism whereby individuals and corporations pay for reductions elsewhere in order to offset their own emissions".[4]

The Encyclopædia Britannica defines a carbon offset as "any activity that compensates for the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2) or other greenhouse gases (measured in carbon dioxide equivalents [CO2e]) by providing for an emission reduction elsewhere."[17]"

 "The "Kaya Identity"

We can actually play around with greenhouse gas emissions scenarios ourselves. To do so, we will take advantage of something known as the Kaya Identify. Technically, the identity is just a definition, relating the quantity of annual carbon emissions to a factor of terms that reflect (1)population growth, (2) relative (i.e., per capita) economic expansion, measured by annual GDP in dollars/person, (3) energy intensity, measured in terawatts of energy consumed per dollar added to GDP, and (4) carbon efficiency, measured in gigatons of carbon emitted per terawatt of energy used. Multiply these out, and you get gigatons of carbon emitted. If the other quantities are expressed as a percentage change per year, then the carbon emissions, too, are expressed as a percentage change per year, which, in turn, defines a future trajectory of carbon emissions and CO2concentrations.
Mathematically, the Kaya identity is expressed in the form:

F = P * (G / P) * (E / G) * (F / E), 
F is global CO2 emissions from human sources
P is global population growth
G is world GDP
E is global energy consumption 

By projecting the future changes in population growth (P), economic expansion (G/P), energy intensity (E/G), and carbon efficiency (F/E), it is possible to make an informed projection of future carbon emissions (F). Obviously, population is important as, in the absence of anything else, more people means more energy use.  Moreover, economic expansion measured by GDP per capita plays an important role, as a bigger economy means greater use of energy. The energy intensity term is where technology comes in. As we develop new energy technologies or improve the efficiency of existing energy technology, we expect that it will take less energy to incerase our GDP by and additional dollar, i.e., we should see a decline in energy intensity. Last, but certainly not least, is the carbon efficiency. As we develop and increasingly switch over to renewable energy sources and non-fossil fuel based energy alternatives and improve the carbon efficiency of existing fossil fuel sources (e.g., by finding a way to extract and sequester CO2), we can expect a decline in this quantity as well, i.e., less carbon emitted per unit of energy production.

Fortunately, we do not have to start from scratch.  There is a convenient on-line calculator here, provided courtesy of David Archer of the University of Chicago (and a RealClimate blogger ). Below a brief demonstration of how the tool can be used. After you watch the demonstration,  use the link provided above to play around with the calculator yourself."

Published March 25, 2009 FoxNews.com

In 2000 and 2001, while Barack Obama served as a board member for a Chicago-based charitable foundation, he helped to fund a pioneering carbon trading exchange that is likely to fill a critical role in the controversial cap-and-trade carbon reduction scheme that President Obama is now trying to push rapidly through Congress.

During those two years, the Joyce Foundation gave nearly $1.1 million in two separate grants that were instrumental in developing and launching the privately-owned Chicago Climate Exchange, which now calls itself "North America's only cap and trade system for all six greenhouse gases, with global affiliates and projects worldwide."

One of those gases is carbon dioxide, the most ubiquitous greenhouse gas and the focus of the most far-reaching -- and contentious -- efforts to combat "climate change." On Monday, Obama's Environmental Protection Agency declared carbon dioxide a public health threat."

"Climate change, water scarcity, flooding, pollution and deforestation present material risks and opportunities to investors.

In order to protect their long term investments, institutional investors must act to reduce the long-term risks arising from environmental externalities.

CDP investor initiatives – backed in 2014 by more than 767 institutional investors representing an excess of US$92 trillion in assets – give investors access to a global source of year-on-year information [hot-air telemetry tracking] that supports long-term objective analysis. This includes evidence and insight into companies' greenhouse gas emissions, water usage and strategies for managing climate change, water and deforestation risks."

"Have You Seen the 2004 Michelle Obama Letter Endorsing Partial-Birth Abortion?
Oct. 23, 2012 5:50pm Erica Ritz

 President Obama's position as a senator on issues like partial-birth abortion– where a live baby is pulled partially out of the birthing canal, only to have its skull punctured with a sharp object– is known to many voters.  Though he voted "present" a remarkable number of times, he voted three times against the Born Alive Act in Illinois, which says that babies who survive late-term abortions are entitled to all the rights and protections any other infant would receive.

Now, LifeNews has uncovered a fundraising letter signed by Michelle Obama in 2004– just one year after President Bush signed a bill banning partial-birth abortion– calling partial-birth abortion a "legitimate medical procedure."

The letter begins:

We have all been concerned lately with the rise of conservatism in this country, especially as it relates to women. You've read the alarming news about the Justice Department's request for hospitals to turn over the private medical records of dozens of patients. This cynical ploy is designed to intimidate a group of physicians and force them to drop their lawsuit seeking to have the so-called partial birth abortion ban ruled unconstitutional.

The fact remains, with no provision to protect the health of the mother, this ban on a legitimate medical procedure is clearly unconstitutional and must be overturned. ​[Emphasis added]
Here is a screen shot of the beginning of the letter:

(Photo via LifeNews)

Michelle Obama has come under fire for the letter before– particularly when her husband was running for president in 2008– but the letter was primarily spoken of, not circulated in its entirety.
"I'd like to ask Michelle how in the world she could in good conscience raise money from fear-mongering about this barbaric abortion procedure," pro-life advocate Jill Stanek said at the time.

When then-candidate Obama issued a warning to keep family out of the public eye, Stanek added: "So it's fine to kill late-term babies, but we can't risk hurting Michelle's feelings about it..."
Since arriving in the White House, the Obamas have remained strong pro-choice advocates, but are far less vocal about late-term abortions.  When asked about their previous stance, Obama representatives have said the legislation interfered with the mother's original right to choose.

If anything, the Obama campaign has turned such issues on their heels.  Their longstanding support for abortion makes them protectors of "women's rights," and those who disagree, or ask women to pay for their own birth control, are accused of waging a "war on women."
Read the entire fundraising letter here.
(H/T: WeaselZippers)"

Yours sincerely, 

Field McConnell, United States Naval Academy, 1971; Forensic Economist; 30 year airline and 22 year military pilot; 23,000 hours of safety; Tel: 715 307 8222 

David Hawkins Tel: 604 542-0891 Forensic Economist; former leader of oil-well blow-out teams; now sponsors Grand Juries in CSI Crime and Safety Investigation


  1. Bill McKibben is a FART SMELLER I MEAN A SMART FELLER! Human malfunction. We are just not good enough to breath the same air as these so called elite.


Who's visiting Abel Danger
view a larger version of the map below at whos.amung.us