Saturday, November 1, 2014

On November 4, Vote Out Incumbents as a Warning to All Future Congresses

Fire Congress, Vote Out Incumbents

Fire this Congress as the people's warning to all future Congresses

By Joel S. Hirschhorn









For politicians to do what is right, first citizens must do what is right.

Of all the many, many stupid things that most Americans do, nothing is more insane than the ritual every two years of reelecting incumbent members of Congress. Countless opinion polls find that the public has incredibly low levels of positive regard for Congress. Just one in 10 Americans approves of the job Congress is doing, according to a Gallup poll released a few weeks ago, tying the branch’s lowest approval rating in 38 years.

Yet this year as in past years, unless Americans take back control of their country, voters will again reelect nearly all incumbents. Often, some incumbents do not even have any significant opposition. For example, in the 2000 election cycle, out of 435 House seats, 64 members had no major-party opponent, and in 2008 every House race in Arkansas was uncontested by a major party according to the Center for Voting and Democracy. Political redesign of congressional districts, gerrymandering, is widely done to ensure reelection of incumbents or one party.

The main way that incumbents get removed from office these days is when they lose in a party primary election, or die, or get themselves into a sex or corruption scandal. Primaries often replace the incumbent with someone else from the same party who will, in time, become an incumbent. That replacement is often a more extreme partisan than the previous incumbent.

The usual rationale for this survival of incumbents given by political analysts and writers is that although the public correctly sees Congress as a whole as incompetent, dysfunctional, and incapable of serving critical public interests, they somehow think that their own Representatives and Senators are worth reelecting. This, of course, makes no sense. If this had validity, then cumulatively and nationally it would make sense to keep incumbents in office, and Congress would get better and better with each election. In fact, Congress has become worse and worse with each election. This holds true in a genuine bipartisan sense, as nearly all incumbents, regardless of party, do not deserve to be reelected.

If Congress as a whole stinks, which it clearly does, then it is only logical to believe that this bleak condition must result from nearly all incumbents contributing to the mess. The exceptions are not defined by simply being the ones on your ballot.

How can a democracy function and have any deserved credibility when the electorate stubbornly refuses to act honestly and appropriately to get rid of the elected representatives who have proven themselves incapable of governing with competence and honor?

There must be better explanations.

Here is a likely one. Most Americans have become beholden to one of the two major political parties, even if they are not officially members of them, and may even consider themselves as uncommitted or independent. Moreover, a majority of people find themselves living in places where their favored party has predominated. When election time rolls around, they cannot get themselves to vote for the candidate from the “other” party and they refuse to vote for third-party candidates. Or they are so fed up with an awful government and political system that they do not vote at all, or not for congressional races.

Another contributing factor might be related to the lesser evil mode of thinking. The incumbent loser that you know is, somehow, thought to be better than the competing candidate you do not know, especially one from the “other” party. Reelecting incumbents is like some form of hallucinatory fantasy deemed the safer choice, as if keeping them in office will magically turn out to be different and better than in previous times. They have seen the light, gotten the message, turned the corner, become what they once promised to be, and so on. Nuts. Congressional experience is not to be rewarded; it must be penalized for rotten performance.

Third, incumbents almost always have the most money because they have already been corrupted by money. More money means more advertising and more lies. Lies work. Especially for the many information-poor voters that are easily swayed by campaign propaganda. The big popular lie of omission these days is staying completely away from their congressional record. No incumbent wants to be seen as an experienced Washington insider. If you failed on the job, why would you?

In our country, effective representative government is crucial. To keep reelecting congressional incumbents that nearly always deserve to be fired is unpatriotic, subversive, and antithetical to the ideals of our constitutional republic.

This year, ten Senators and 42 Representatives are not running for reelection. Odds are that far fewer incumbents will be voted out of office, if historic trends continue. For House elections from 1982 to 2008, only one in three voters did not vote for a winning House representative, and 73 percent of House races were won by landslide margins of at least 20 percentage points. The power of incumbency reduces much-needed political competition which a healthy democracy requires.

If the royalty of incumbency does not stop, there is no hope whatsoever of putting the nation on a much better track. It does not matter who is elected president. In the end, if the fractured Congress we have witnessed for years perseveres, the US is doomed to join the list of once-great global powers that went down the toilet.

Flush congressional incumbents out. Now. Or be complicit in the death of American democracy. Stop making excuses, rationalizing. Throw incumbent turds out of office. Even more important than not voting for the challenger or incumbent from the “other” party is not voting for the incumbent of your party, even if it threatens party control of the House or Senate.

If you do not help fire Congress, then you deserve to suffer personally from what the federal government does or does not do. Make you voice really heard this year.

Contact Joel S. Hirschhorn through www.delusionaldemocracy.com.
________

On Tuesday, November 4, Vote The Incumbents Out!
_______

Vote out the entire Congress? You bet.

Posted by Chris Cillizza

The Washington Post












Need more evidence of just how unhappy the American public is with Congress?

Look no further than today’s NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, where 54 percent of those tested said that if they had the opportunity to vote out every single Member of Congress — including their own — they would take it.

That’s the highest that number has been in the 18 months or so that NBC/WSJ have been asking the question — and the clearest evidence yet that we may be headed to a “pox on both your houses” election the likes of which we have never seen before.

Obviously there is no place on the ballot where you can vote out every incumbent — though it would be kind of fascinating if there was, wouldn’t it? — and elections are fought district by district, not in a single national vote.

But, the NBC/WSJ poll question provides a helpful barometer of the discontent that people are feeling toward Congress generally and also gauges how willing — at least at the moment — they are to act on those feelings.

Looking back on the (relatively) short history of the question, the new numbers are jarring.

Just before the 2010 election — where Republicans picked up a whopping 63 House seats — just 45 percent of those polled said they would vote out every incumbent including their own.

That the number has now risen to 54 percent suggests that the 2010 election, which many people cast as a moment of closure for voters wanting to vent their unhappiness with Washington, was actually just a midpoint in an ever-increasing displeasure with how the nation’s capital and its inhabitants operate.

(Another piece of evidence that speaks to that unhappiness: 82 percent of people disapprove of how Congress is handling its jobs in the NBC/WSJ poll — the highest number in the survey ever; in the new Washington Post/ABC News poll, 68 percent disapproved of how Republicans in Congress are doing their job.)

As we have written before, there is no historical precedent for voters throwing out large numbers of incumbents of both parties in a single election. Blame tends to congregate around a single party — usually the one perceived as being in charge in Washington — rather than being spread out to both sides.

But, we are living in historically anomalous political times. The eye-popping disapproval numbers for Congress, the large number of people who say the country is headed off in the wrong direction and the ongoing economic malaise are creating a strange brew that we’ve not witnessed before.

Also see:

"Fire Congress": on November 4th, Occupy the Voting Booth and vote the incumbents out!

Free Speech Productions - Lieutenant Morrisseau - Interview II : Our Latest Comedy Show

2 comments:

  1. Disapproval of State of the World is beyond unhappiness.

    Politicians and Corporations have no interest in fostering society where harmony with the environment and with each other, receives precedence over profit and abuse - realize the nature of the Beast.

    Voting at ballot boxes is tacit agreement with the staus quo, and is subject to the same corruption (tampering) seen everywhere.

    The authentic votes of reckoning are the Steps that disengage one from participating with the Machine that disregards you, and assuming responsibility of self reliance. Connect with Love not fear.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For best results, work within the system and without the system. Start from where you are, and rise from there.

      Delete

Who's visiting Abel Danger
view a larger version of the map below at whos.amung.us

You Too can be a CAPTAIN SHERLOCK