Saturday, November 1, 2014

Two spaceship crashes in 3 days? - Setting the stage for forced Ebola quarantines - Zionists to bomb Al-Aqsa mosque, blame Arabs?

Source: Jim Stone Freelance

New: Forum

October 31 2014

Two spaceship crashes in 3 days?

I do not buy it: it is willful sabotage

The first one, an Antares rocket which was sent to resupply the space station, was willfully destroyed after a "telemetry error" was detected. Six seconds into launch. SIX SECONDS? WHY SIX? Anyone who hits this web site ought to know the significance of that number: it is basically a code for lying/clandestine action.

The Antares rocket was willfully destroyed even though, despite the "telemetry" error (which does not mean "flight system error" – it only means a communications glitch), the rocket was doing a perfectly normal takeoff and had not done anything visibly anomalous AT ALL.

I am going to call it: someone is sabotaging the private American space program, and it is a group of people who practically worship the number SIX, including with a star. If you think they want what is best for America, just watch the Ebola psyop continue, and think again.

The latest? A short while ago (minutes ago), Virgin lost their space plane due to a "serious anomaly". I beg the question, what was it? a Stuxnet anomaly? Come on now, it was only a FREAKING AIRPLANE WITH A ROCKET MOTOR – HOW DO YOU CRASH AN AIRPLANE IN THIS DAY AND AGE?

1. STUPIDITY – rule that out.

2. SHOOT IT DOWN, BLOW IT UP, OR SABOTAGE IT. THAT is what we are looking at, folks. I was doubting the Antares explosion was legit, but Virgin's space plane sealed the deal: these programs are being sabotaged, and that is all there is to it.

Go to YouTube and watch the Antares rocket explosion. While watching what happens, realize that there was NO MALFUNCTION THAT CAUSED THE EXPLOSION: it was someone pushing an auto-destruct button to blow the engines out. Perfectly normal take off, and POOF.

Then ask yourself who would want such a spectacular failure at the expense of America's image. There will be your answer as to who had that rocket destroyed, and a tip towards any murder investigations that should be launched to expose what truthfully happened in today's Virgin Galactic crash.

To be PERFECTLY CLEAR: The rocket had absolutely NO hardware failures: six seconds into launch, it was simply stated to have developed a "telemetry failure". Scammers in the media are saying ground control hit self-destruct after the failure and before it hit the ground, but in reality, the initial explosion WAS THE AUTO-DESTRUCT, and the lies surrounding this prove something is being covered up.

DISCLAIMER: What is America doing using Cold War era Soviet surplus JUNK for NASA missions, anyway? See anything flaky with that? I SURE DO. Blow up Afghanistan. Murder much of Iraq. Run Gitmo years after claimed shut down. Stock DHS with a billion rounds of ammo. Give APCs to all police departments. Screwball Libya. Stage a few beheadings… and at the end of all of that, when the money is gone, STICK NASA WITH OLD SOVIET CRAP. See anything wrong with that? That's OK, because it is OBVIOUS they are going to try to kill off the rest of the "American dream" with an "Ebola" outbreak, real or not – who will care about NASA then?

Setting the stage for forced Ebola quarantines

Peter wrote:

The media story about Kaci Hickox disobeying quarantine and travel restrictions is designed to make the public start debating... civil rights vs. "public safety." The wording, and the story, is written to lean towards fear – that she is jeopardizing us. And if that public mindset sets in, it's a short step to a mass policy that can detain anyone. The governor is taking this case to the courts now, and arguing constitutionality. Precedent will be set.

To do mass public detaining, they need to make the criteria to detain as slim as possible, and the risk of exposure as great as possible. First, she had no symptoms and twice tested negative. So anyone within X distance of ebola places is a public risk. As far as how it can be spread.... Now CDC says dogs may be able to transmit, while themselves showing no symptoms because they have natural antibodies. This means anyone connected to a dog who has been around other dogs who have been near ebola patients, will now put people at risk. I'm not saying this is exactly what they will do, but it exemplifies the ease they can take this case, make connections that link anyone to ebola, and recommend quarantine at risk of jail time. The LA Times just reported California will enforce this policy, as a misdemeanor criminal offense if disobeyed.

My comment:

It could not possibly be any more obvious that the people running America want either a real pandemic or plausible grounds for fronting a fake one. And despite being totally busted three times – even with Nana Kwame's expose, Eric Duncan's proven service as regional director of the Peace Corps for Liberia, and the girl saying right to the cameras that Doctor Spencer is NOT the guy, they are pushing for the Ebola scam in New York: they are not giving up on this. They are going full steam ahead, truth and exposure be damned.

This means there is an agenda with this one that they will not back off on, no matter how badly the scam and agenda is exposed. In the past, they would back off. Why is this one different? And why are they still allowing flights to and from the "Ebola zones"? Why are they now saying Ebola spreads like the flu, and thrives in the cold? What about the dog story? All of it is PATENT B.S. – WHY are they not backing off?

ANSWER: They are religious zealots with a deadline to meet. Their recent actions proves something is amiss with them, and they are going for broke. Whatever the deadline is, it is now OBVIOUS that they HAVE TO get everyone "vaccinated" with a shot of dubious origins within a very short time window. The sheer brazen nature of it all proves that this is a do or die situation for them, and it totally discredits the entire "Ebola" meme. It makes it all obvious THEY WANT THIS, IT IS THEIR BABY, and PROOF is in the fact THERE ARE NO HOLDS ON FLIGHTS FROM THE EBOLA ZONE.

It is the job of the government to act in the best interests of the nation it "serves". When dealing with the safety of its citizens, America is NOT SUPPOSED TO CARE ABOUT POLITICS IN AFRICA. The fact that flights are continuing unabated means one of two things – either: 1. Ebola is not real at all, and they need a ruse, OR 2. They really want this pandemic to spread as far and as fast as conceivably possible. Either way, they are playing the role of an enemy: AVOID THE SHOT AT ALL COST.

Zionists to bomb Al-Aqsa mosque, blame Arabs?

Jadinardo wrote:

9/11 research shows that the World Trade Center was closed and evacuated for a couple of days prior to the September 11th attacks. CIA/Black Ops/Israeli Mossad were planting controlled demolition explosives in the Twin Towers. Today, they closed Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem.

My response:

Suspicion warranted. They have the blood moon tetrad as a timeline, as far as they see it. People erroneously believe that the blood moon tetrad is doom for Israel. Historically, however, it has not always been the case.

The blood moon tetrads have been one of two things: either a time of great triumph, or a time of disaster for Israel – and nothing else. It is not a static time for them. SO, they probably intend to try to force the issue this time and make it a tetrad of triumph. That is why we have the Ebola scare (real or not) in full swing, lame PR attempts like ISIS, the huge assault on Gaza... this could backfire on Israel to an epic degree. So if they wanted to destroy Al-Aqsa, now is the time, as far as they see it. Do not see the re-opening of Al-Aqsa as any sort of victory: explosives could easily be planted that will be set off at a possibly MUCH later date.

1 comment:

  1. Boeing's Chris Chadwick, the boss of one of the world’s largest military contractors, BDSS, believes the company has a big part to play in manned spacecraft


Who's visiting Abel Danger
view a larger version of the map below at