Saturday, August 22, 2015

Abel Danger Aviation Investigative Team: AVIATION INVESTIGATION: FINAL REPORT OF EVENTS - Parts One, Two and Three - Malaysian Airlines MAS370: MH370: Boeing B772: 9M-MRO - Malaysian Airlines MAS17: MH17: Boeing B772: 9M-MRD*** - GermanWings GWI18G: GW-4U-9525: Airbus A322

AVIATION INVESTIGATION: FINAL REPORT OF EVENTS ~ 
Date of Original Report: 7-27-2015. Prepared by "Agent Kiwi" for the Abel Danger Aviation Investigative Team 
Updated 8-20-2015. [Fourth Revision]

PART ONE

Malaysian Airlines MAS370: MH370: Boeing B772: 9M-MRO 
Date of Incident: 3-08-2014 
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia – Beijing, China. P.O.B 227: Crew 12: Total 239

Want to follow progress on these Investigations? 
Contact: Captain Field McConnell [Retired]
 fieldmcc@yahoo.com 
+001 715 307 8222 
@fieldmcc 

[Picture only... NOT the B772 aircraft which this report is based upon.]

WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO TRAVEL SAFELY IN THE HANDS OF EXPERIENCED FLIGHT CREW.
WE CAN, [AND WE DO], UNTIL EXTERNAL INFLUENCES INTERVENE AND SEIZE CONTROL, FORCING INNOCENT PEOPLE TO BECOME PRISONERS AND INVOLUNTARY PARTICIPANTS OF WORLDWIDE EVIL ACTIVITIES.
THESE ACTS ARE PERFORMED BY THE VERY PEOPLE WHO WE EXPECT TO PROTECT US AND ACT IN OUR BEST INTERESTS. 
THEY ARE NOTHING LESS THAN MASS MURDERERS!


SUMMARY OF MALAYSIAN AIRLINES MAS370/MH370/9M-MRO ~
Disappearance of Aircraft Investigation Notes ~
Date of Initial Preparation ~ July 27 2015. Updated August 08 2015
• Flight MH370 departed Kuala Lumpur as per normal protocol and on time. No anomalies detected in ATC transcripts or with the initial direction of travel.

• FlightRadar24 data revealed erratic, frequent "Military-style" directional and altitudinal anomalies of MH370 directly off the coast of Malaysia at FL350. [Flight Level 350.] Two fast moving unidentified targets appeared in the immediate vicinity of MH370. It is my belief that these were Military Fighter Jets despatched to intercept and commandeer MH370 to Diego Garcia. The NZ Herald reported three weeks after the disappearance of MH370 that the aircraft had performed a series of Military style manoeuvres that were pronounced and for which would not be within the capacity and training of a commercial Pilot to perform.
They would most certainly be challenging for a large aircraft such as a Boeing 777 to execute, given its size. There would accordingly have to have been intervention by Military Personnel.
• MH370 executed a left turn at the precise waypoint of ATC handover from Malaysia to Vietnam. No communication with Vietnam ATC was ever made by MH370 and it was only flagged of concern app 17 mins after comms should have taken place. [Another Aircraft was asked to attempt contact with MH370 on the distress frequency but only received a scratchy reply with muffled sounds.] This is the perfect point at which to conveniently allow an aircraft to simply "drop off the radar," because the ATC handing over flight comms is no longer actively interested in that flight, automatically expecting the comms with Vietnam to commence on a different frequency to Malaysia. Search & Rescue teams were not activated until app 5hrs later, citing darkness as the reason for the deferral.

• The initial search focused to the East of MH370's last "known" location, for app 9 days. The Chinese produced photos claiming to be the wreckage of MH370. An oil slick was detected on the South China Sea and investigated. Tests proved it was not aviation related. Chinese Authorities later admitted that photo was "Stock Files" and not of MH370 wreckage, or in any way connected to any aircraft

• Those awaiting arrival of MH370 were given minimal information and rapidly removed to a nearby hotel, where they were placed in a locked room with heavy security posted outside. Why? What were the Authorities so intent on keeping secret and out of the Public Domain?!

• Information from the Authorities was vague and sporadic and revealed very little information of any significance or comfort.

• Authorities announced pings from MH370 were detected in a westerly direction. Search moved to Southern Indian Ocean and relocated multiple times. No wreckage or associated items were located.

• Local Villagers heard the sound of loud "screaming" jet aircraft engines just app 0130 - 0145hrs at Marang, located in North West Malaysia. This location is south of Sultan Mahmud International Airport. My investigations revealed there were no hangers or suitable storage facilities for a B772, or indeed any aircraft at this location. The Villagers filed a report with Malaysian Police at 1030hrs. This information is alleged to have been passed to Malaysian Military to investigate. We hear nothing further and little is mentioned of this event.

• MH370 was detected flying over the South West Coast of Malaysia, crossing over Kawalagi International Airport. This is briefly mentioned in MSM. There were reports that the aircraft may have diverted due to a fire or on-board emergency. This is unlikely because –

• MH370 issued no "Pan Pan Pan" or "Mayday communication."

• No alerts of any type were issued from the flight deck. This is inconsistent with a genuine emergency or any event involving the aircraft.

• There is no valid or logical reason to deviate from the intended flight plan, in the event of an emergency.

• MH370 crossed over TWO International Airports without filing a distress call or making any attempt to land.

• Pilot suicide is ruled out. Aircraft could have been flown directly into the sea from FL350 without the need to fly hours off course in the wrong direction, creating an extreme likelihood of detection. Captain was of sound mind and had commented to a friend before flying that he was looking forward to going shopping with him upon his return. Not likely to be the words of a suicidal Pilot!

• Inference made to MH370 climbing to FL420, stalling and diving into sea. Possible but ruled out – no wreckage detected, and the aircraft was positively identified by Civilians at a waypoint after this location.

• There were reports from people who were on the ground awaiting updates on the flight, that cellphones of the passengers were ringing, when they attempted to contact those aboard. This was dismissed by Authorities as being the hearing of the ringing tone, whilst the telephone exchange was attempting to connect to the handsets. If a cellphone is off it will go to messaging or give a recorded message that the handset is "off or outside the coverage area." Authorities claim that cellphones won't operate over 7,000ft. My investigations revealed firm evidence of a cellphone ringing aboard a B763 at FL390 during a domestic Qantas service between Melbourne [MEL] and Sydney [SYD] during 2014. My conversation with the passenger who personally experienced this event, [a personal friend of the Author] substantiated as fact that cellphones ARE INDEED OPERABLE at cruising altitude. This individual works in the travel industry and previously worked with a lady who was cabin crew for 12 years. She validated that flight & cabin crew do in fact have their cellphones switched on during flights and can and do indulge in cellphone usage whilst in flight.

• I have personally worked in the Cellular industry for Telco's such as Telecom AKL NZL; Ericsson Cellular AKL NZL; BellSouth AKL NZL, as an Activations Specialist; and Fone Zone CNS AUS. I also have an avid interest in Cellular systems and understand the principles behind what IS and what ISN'T possible. To claim these cellphones wouldn’t and didn't connect to an incoming call, within the range of suitable cell sites, is nothing short of disinformation and deception.

• Evidence available shows that two successive cellular calls were made from the Flight Deck of MH370 from the Co-Pilot's handset. The first call connected to the recipients number, then immediately terminated. The subsequent 2nd attempt registered with a Cell site Tower in Penang near the route the diverted B772 took. The Cellular Service Provider refused to supply data pertaining to these calls, despite the "Switch" registering the operation of the cellular handset in question TWICE!

• Thai Military detected two "fast moving objects" on a Southerly trajectory, flying in the opposing direction of MH370 passing through same airspace; PRIOR to MH370 being detected travelling in the opposite direction. . Reports were made by two civilians, of what appeared to be an aircraft on fire. One was male and was stationed on an Oil Rig; the other was a female sailing solo off the West Coast of Australia. Both stated these fires looked unusual and of an orange colour. I believe they saw the afterburners of two military fighter jets on route to intercept MH370. Thai Military did not report these events until four days after MH370 had been reported "missing." They stated they were not concerned as the objects detected were not in/near their airspace and as such were not an immediate threat to their country. REALLY?!

• Boeing B772 airliners have two transponders and an ACARS system, located in the Electrics & Electronics Bay [E/E Bay,] external of flight deck and below floor of forward galley. This is accessed via a hatch. This houses the entire "brains" of the aircraft and where access would need to be made to disengage appropriate units/circuits. Both Airbus and Boeing have Uninterruptable Auto-Pilot systems installed which are manufactured by General Electric and are referred to as BUAP & AUAP respectively. This system operates independent of the flight crew and does not allow them to over-ride it. It is installed with the intention of external control of a flight being undertaken in the case of fire, emergencies or terrorist activity. It can be hacked into and accessed via the ground or on-board, and it takes the full operation of the aircraft out of the Pilots’ control and cannot be over-ridden. Malaysian Airlines MH370, MH17 and GermanWings 4U 9525 are believed to have been hacked into via this method.

• Multiple "Person's of interest/value" were on-board MH370. Twenty from Freescale Semiconductor which is located in Austin Texas, USA. [On September 15 2006 it accepted a buyout by a Consortium led by The Blackstone Group and it’s co-investors, of which The Carlyle Group is one of. In March 2015 a merger agreement was announced through which Freescale Semiconductor would be acquired by NXP Semiconductors, and that the Companies will be merged in a $40 Billion US-dollar deal.
Source: Wikipedia. Lord Jacob Rothschild has ties into these companies and is named on a patent for a "System for Optimizing Number of Dies produced on a Wafer" for inclusion in micro-chips, [along with the four inventors,] who were claimed to be aboard MH370 but whose names do not appear on the Pax manifest. The patent for this microchip was filed on December 21 2012 and approved on March 11 2014 – 3 days after MH370 went missing – [Read: hijacked.] If any named benefactors are deceased or "presumed deceased beyond reasonable doubt," the proceeds of that patent are dispersed amongst the surviving benefactors. This Wafer is the world’s smallest and most advanced. It will fit into the dimple of a golf ball. Whichever Country/Military has possession has ultimate advantage over its opponents. Twenty other cyber-spy, military systems engineers, Company Executives, etc were aboard MH370 from Companies such as Huawei, ZTE, IBM and other Companies of significance.

The microchip containing the patented product is known as the Kinetis KL03 and was invented in Freescale Semiconductor's facilities in Kuala Lumpur, hence the KL tag to its name. The prototype was aboard on-route to their testing facilities in Beijing, China. The prototype was aboard MH370. My investigations into this microchip in early 2015 by accessing Freescale's website, revealed the product available for purchase and receiving a design award in 2014. Quite feasible, given that MH370 went missing March 2014; however this would require the inventors to be alive to produce the product. I believe they were.

Upon revisiting the Freescale webpage at the time of compiling this updated report, August 2015, I could find no mention of any KL product, let alone the KL02 or KL03. Only K series were mentioned. References to the design award were unable to be located upon this subsequent visit to Freescale's webpage.
• Pings were detected in the Bay of Bengal. This was confirmed by Search and Rescue Teams part way through their searching in the Southern Indian Ocean. I believe this to be where the B772 headed to perform a wide arc turn to line-up on final approach for its intended destination. This would be necessary for an aircraft of the size and dimensions of a B772 aircraft.

• Sighting was made of low-flying aircraft matching Malaysian B772 description, by fishermen in the Maldives at app 0615hrs. The time is consistent with time zone changes, distance and lapsed flying time. Note that the original intended destination of Beijing, China was of comparable distance with the diverted route taken. This validates that MH370 could have and indeed did arrive at its alternative destination. Witnesses' claim the aircraft was flying lower than flights would normally approach, giving them sufficient cause for concern and accordingly report the sighting to authorities. Engines were "screaming." The engines would most likely be at high power settings due to the thicker air at lower altitudes, combined with flaps configured to maximum extension - essential for MH370 to remain airborne. My investigations concur with the reports from these witnesses. I believe they positively identified MH370 on final approach for Diego Garcia Military Installation located on an Atoll to the South, after crossing the Chagos Archipelagos. The size and colours of the fuselage were consistent with MH370. Aircraft was reported as a B747; however, given these witnesses were viewing from the sea, and with B747 and B777 aircraft being of similar dimensions, could easily be mistaken. These reports were mentioned by Malaysian Authorities at a Press Conference and dismissed with the following statement.... "We have had a report of an aircraft matching the description of MH370 flying over the Maldives, however these people wouldn’t know what they saw, are not credible witnesses, and as such we are not reading anything into it."
Diego Garcia is a very closely guarded Military Installation located in the Southern Indian Ocean, and in the vicinity of where search patterns were conducted in an "effort" to locate MH370. It is occupied by American and Israeli Personnel and has been leased from Britain since 1974. It stores nuclear weapons and it services ships and submarines in the region. It has undersea facilities large enough to store B52 Bomber aircraft and a prison which housed some prisoners from the Afghanistan and Israeli wars. The island's native residents were shipped off the Atoll and relocated to Mauritius and Seychelles and refused access to return. Confidential documents located in the UK, clearly show that "the only other living things to be on this Atoll, other than Military Personnel, are to be Seagulls.

Published on Oct 28, 2013. Producer Andrew Tkach and correspondent Christian Amanpour report on the hushed up eviction of the indigenous people of Diego Garcia to make way for one of America's most strategic air and navy bases. The full story aired on CBS News 60 Minutes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxVao1HnL1s
• March 08 2014 ~ Evidence conclusively proved MH370 was landed automatically via remote hacking and brought to a standstill in the centre of the runway. The final co-ordinates from MH370 ACARS system trace back to a large hanger located to the south on the Atoll and large enough to house a B772 aircraft. A blank photo, taken by the IBM executive aboard, [Philip Wood] was able to be sent to his female partner. The GPS ingrained coordinates point to the precise location of this hanger. All personnel leave off this Atoll was cancelled effective the morning of March 08 2014. All movements to and from the Atoll were embargoed. Any personnel who needed to depart were told to take their personal possessions and sufficient funds to facilitate their return to their home station in the USA. The reason given was that they might not be returning to the Atoll.

• A requisition was filed for a Container ship this same morning. According to a comment made by a former military person who was stationed on the Atoll, the coding used on the order was for the "transportation of people/personnel." The "Ocean Shield" set sail from Australia bound for DG Atoll the same day of this requisition - the same morning MH370 went missing. My investigations uncovered a copy of this requisition form which had a link to take for further information. Upon accessing this link a tab opened on my computer screen with a Log-in and Password request in the centre of a black and otherwise blank page; except for the words "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" and immediately below, "DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE." These were positioned at the top of the screen, along with the relevant insignia.

• Prince William and Kate flew into the Maldives on the morning of March 08 2014 for the purpose of William participating in two S&R exercises involving five nations which were underway in the immediate area of the search region of MH370. Why did they not offer their services and facilities? Aircraft flew from West Australia for five hours with sufficient fuel reserves for a two hour search pattern before needing to return to Australia for refuelling. A TV3 News "printed article" made reference to these two exercises being conducted at the time. A copy of this item is available within files held in my possession. My belief is these exercises were set up with the intention of "supervising" the zone to ensure search teams did not get near areas DG did not want them near.

• The search area where MH370 was eventually "claimed" to have "crashed" was extremely remote, subject to extremes of weather and sea conditions, is an area not traversed by commercial flights for these reasons, and also due to patchy and poor radio communications. It should be noted that no wreckage has ever washed up on any coast. This seems extremely unusual given the strong currents flowing through this region. [Piece of wing mechanism located on Reunion Island, Mauritius on 7-29-2015. At the time of writing, this piece of wreckage is still being examined and is awaiting the arrival of Malaysian Personnel.]

• A specialist satellite was brought in from China in an attempt to locate MH370. This seems most odd, considering the nature of news reports via live feeds with today’s technology. It was announced that a submersible device had detected and taken photos of a ships anchor in the same area MH370 was being searched for. Yet we were told search teams could not access the sea floor due to the geographical nature of the terrain and depth.

• In the early months of 2015 a statement was made that "We are confident of locating the wreckage of MH370 by the time we call the search off at the end of May." This did not happen. I am questioning how this statement can "confidently" be made when the search has been underway for nearly 18 months with nothing of significance being located. The only way this statement could be made is if they already knew where the wreckage was, or where it is to be located after being conveniently placed there.
My belief is that the search exercise is in essence a public pacifier to make it appear they are seriously trying to locate MH370, and that the search has been stretched out for the purpose of delay tactics and to attempt to validate the difficult task and logistics of the search "efforts."
• The ACARS system continued to transmit pings via satellite every hour as to the location of MH370 and was something not factored into the equation with those responsible for this incident. Most airlines lease their engines from Boeing. This is because the engines are the most expensive part of an aircraft, costing $20M each. Accordingly, Boeing monitors their performance via information pinged back to them by the engines. This information pertains to oil usage, fuel consumption, any maintenance aspects or concerns, amongst other data. It is my belief Boeing knew where MH370 was and where it was heading. The CIA and NSA most likely also know more than they have revealed.

• It is my belief that some of the wreckage of MH370 will be conveniently located and retrieved at some stage in the near future, in an attempt to obtain closure on this conspiracy. [! See updates!]

• My investigations concur with other Investigators that the events of MH370 and MH17 are directly linked, and that the same aircraft [9M-MRO] was used to service MH17 in another conspiracy. A report on this subsequent event appears further in this report compilation.

• UPDATES: AUGUST 08 2015 ~

• I began compiling my Final Report on the evening of Sunday July 26 2015. This was finally completed app midnight and was emailed to the Abel Danger Team in Wisconsin, USA. It was mentioned in the morning LiveStream broadcast and posted to the AD webpage that same day. It then found its way around various agents and into the public arena. Around this time, The United Nations were meeting in New York and trying to obtain a consensus that the Report into the downing of MH17 would be accepted by all parties. Not surprisingly, the Russian Administration would not agree to conform to this request; for obvious and valid reasons.

• On July 29 2015, MSM reported that a piece of wing known as a Flaperon was found on a beach on the Northeast coast of the French Island of La Reunion. It was believed to be from a Boeing 777 and accordingly was strongly suggested as being off 9M-MRO...the airframe which serviced MH370 on March 08 2014.

• It seems very coincidental that this piece of wreckage is revealed merely 2 days after my report hits the Abel Danger website and whilst the United Nations are discussing the upcoming MH17 report.

• A piece of luggage was found later by the same “Beach Cleaner” who located the Flaperon. With all the wreckage which would be evident after an aircraft accident, it is extremely unlikely that these would be the only items washed up on La Reunion Island. Investigators are still to ascertain whether the Flaperon was actually off the B772 which serviced MH370 [9M-MRO.] The wingspan of this aircraft is 199’ 11” [200ft!] yet all that is “found” is one piece of app 7’ long!

Abel Danger Investigators based in the UK and Wisconsin, USA, contacted the French, alerting them to this discovery and urging them to immediately head to La Reunion and secure the evidence for transportation back to Toulouse. This was successfully achieved aboard an Air France aircraft and taken to an Investigative facility specialising in the examination and analysis of potential explosive events to metals and other materials, along with other evidence to ascertain where the aircraft part likely originated from and what likely happened to it to cause it to wash up on La Reunion. It is my understanding that an event involving an Airbus A310 occurred in these waters in 2009 and that this part could have come from that aircraft. [Ref: Jim Stone.]

• Jim Stone's website presents valuable and interesting data pertaining to the likelihood of barnacles being present on the Flaperon. Assuming the part had floated to La Reunion, it would be unlikely to have barnacles but no algae, which is a food source for them. The positioning of the barnacles is not consistent and they appear to be strategically “placed.” Jim Stone has previously cleaned boat hulls and says where there's barnacles, so too should there be algae. He also comments that the barnacles would have been damaged due to the waves pushing the Flaperon up the beach. There should also be scour marks on this part from the rocks which are evident on this beach.

• One of Abel Danger's proficient Agents has produced a short You Tube video. This shows that if the B772 flaps are fully extended and the airspeed [KIAS] is pushed above intended maximums that the Flaperon would rip off.

• It is calculated by the Investigative Team that if the Flaperon was “dropped” into the ocean near Diego Garcia it would have approx 1500km or mi to travel in 500 days, which would equate to a daily distance travelled of 3km or mi. Given the strength and anti-clockwise rotation of currents in this portion of ocean, it would tie in with those calculations. Also, any part "dropped" or falling from an aircraft should be exhibiting some form of substantial damage from the stresses imposed from the resulting impact of hitting the ocean. This would be akin to an item hitting concrete. I would expect the condition of the Flaperon to be somewhat substantially more "munted" than appears to be the case, leading me to believe that if it wasn't expelled whilst the B772 was in flight then certainly from a vessel, possibly associated with the "search" for the missing flight.

• Below are some diagrams pertaining to the Flaperon. Credits: http://abeldanger.net and Jim Stone at http://82.221.129.208/aa1index.html

• Jim Stone has presented a very compelling report which appeared recently in the "Uncensored" magazine and from which valuable information and photos have been very pivotal in piecing together events of MH370 and MH17. Thank You Jim for your commitment, dedication and intense investigation to produce substantial pieces of evidence. Likewise the Abel Danger team have provided valuable data which has assisted in the compilation of this report. Without all input from non-MSM this report would not be possible. Thank you all!

• 657BB Flaperon Leading Edge Panel 14x5 113W6110 There are many types of barnacles in the Indian Ocean. The gooseneck barnacle is prolific in tropical and sub-tropical waters. It cannot reproduce in cold waters.  It quickly forms thick masses on floating debris as pictured below.  The Flaperon has not been in the water that long based visually upon its single layer and one species barnacle population. It certainly has not been in sub-tropical waters for even 10 months, let alone in water for 18 months. Again, it only has one type of barnacle population, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lepas_anatifera It fell off the back of Warren's ship not that long ago before growing barnacles for 2 months. Lepas anatifera, commonly known as the pelagic gooseneck barnacle or smooth gooseneck barnacle, is a species of barnacle in the family Lepadidae. These barnacles are found, often in large numbers, attached by their flexible stalks to floating timber, the hulls of ships, piers, pilings, seaweed and various sorts of flotsam.
Below – The Flaperon retrieved off Saint Andrea, La Reunion Island.

The island of La Reunion [Fr. Territory]
FOOTNOTE – The Boeing 777 Aircraft has been in service for app 19 years and is deemed to be one of the safest aircraft flying today. There is app only four events recorded involving the Boeing 777. The likelihood of a major incident involving total loss and non-recovery of one of these aircraft is extremely minimal. The fact that TWO B772 aircraft were involved in catastrophic events, less than five months apart of each other, is no mere coincidence. Even more ridiculous is that both these aircraft are from the same airline; in this case – Malaysian. Sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction. These two incidents fully prove this statement does in fact apply to these aircraft events.
The aforementioned findings and data are as accurate as possible based on the indisputable evidence, which has been cross-referenced and substantiated through various media and other sources. However some content is the opinion of the Author of this document, based upon evidence uncovered during investigations. No responsibility will be assumed for any action any person takes in response to their interpretation of any portion of this report. There is no copyright assigned and you are free to distribute it or forward it on to any individual or organisation, whether or not same are able to forward the contents to those enabled to legally act upon progressing these cases, with the intention of the truth being exposed.

"Whilst one can and should have their own opinions, one should not challenge the presented indisputable facts without having been through the investigation of the case, and accordingly uncovered events and data which makes sense, can be supported with evidence, and for which would stand the test of a Jury in an International Independent Court of Law.

To base a case on mere conjecture and personal opinion, is to fail in the duty of mortal justice to those directly affected by the outcome of that investigation, whether those said individuals be indeed surviving or deceased."

"Agent Kiwi" 
AD Private Intelligence Worldwide Network. 
Aviation Investigation Division 
July 08 2015

GLOSSARY ~

A322: Airbus A320-200
ACARS: Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System
APP: Approximately
ATC: Air Traffic Control
AUAP: Airbus Un-Interruptible Auto Pilot
B772: Boeing 777-200ER
B763: Boeing 767-300
BUAP: Boeing Un-Interruptible Auto Pilot
CIA: Central Intelligence Agency, USA
Comms: Communications
CVR: Cockpit Voice Recorder [Records on-board flight deck audio]
DG: Diego Garcia Atoll Military Installation
FAA: Federal Aviation Administration
FBI: Federal Bureau of Investigation, USA
FDR: Flight Data Recorder [Records pertinent parameters & technical information of the flight] FL: Flight Level [Followed by numbers] FL350 = 35,000ft
MSM: Mainstream Media
NSA: National Security Agency, USA
NTSB: National Transportation Safety Board
9M-MRO: The registration number allocated to the B772 which serviced MH370
9M-MRD: The registration number allegedly allocated to the B772 which is purported to have serviced MH17


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


AVIATION INVESTIGATION: FINAL REPORT OF EVENTS ~ 

Date of Original Report: 7-27-2015. Prepared by "Agent Kiwi" for the Abel Danger Aviation Investigative Team 
Updated 8-20-2015. [Fourth Revision]

PART TWO

Malaysian Airlines MAS17: MH17: Boeing B772: 9M-MRD*** 
Date of Incident: 7-17-2014 
Amsterdam, Netherlands - Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. P.O.B 283: Crew 15: Total 298

Want to follow progress on these Investigations? 
Contact: Captain Field McConnell [Retired] 
fieldmcc@yahoo.com 
+001 715 307 8222 @fieldmcc 
*** This is the airframe that was claimed to be servicing MH17.
Evidence obtained conclusively proves that the airframe of 9M-MRO, [which serviced MH370,] was used for servicing MH17.

[Picture only... NOT the B772 aircraft which this report is based upon.]

WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO TRAVEL SAFELY IN THE HANDS OF EXPERIENCED FLIGHT CREW.
WE CAN, [AND WE DO], UNTIL EXTERNAL INFLUENCES INTERVENE AND SEIZE CONTROL, FORCING INNOCENT PEOPLE TO BECOME PRISONERS AND INVOLUNTARY PARTICIPANTS OF WORLDWIDE EVIL ACTIVITIES.
THESE ACTS ARE PEFORMED BY THE VERY PEOPLE WHO WE EXPECT TO PROTECT US AND ACT IN OUR BEST INTERESTS. THEY ARE NOTHING LESS THAN MASS MURDERERS!


SUMMARY OF MALAYSIAN AIRLINES MAS17/MH17/9M-MRD ~
Downing of Aircraft Facts & Investigation Notes ~
Date of Preparation ~ July 27 2015
• Less than five months after the incident involving MH370, MH 17 was allegedly brought down by BUK missile, into a tightly guarded “at war” region of Ukraine. This area was occupied by Pro-Russian Separatists.

• It has been noted that app 100 top AIDS scientists were on their way to a conference in Australia, aboard MH17 via Kuala Lumpur. Whether this factored into the reasons for the MH17 incident is unknown by me at this stage.

• I have viewed an English subtitled Russian BBC TV item which interviewed Villagers in the immediate area where MH17 was taken down. Their accounts of what happened were as follows.....

• BUK missile launching was being undertaken in the vicinity of the location in which media claimed it was launched. The Villagers claim that it was common to see Ukrainian SU25 Military Fighter Jets shadowing any aircraft passing overhead. This activity was observed the day MH17 was shot down. Residents reported seeing the jets firing on the Malaysian aircraft and that it was not impacted by a BUK, or indeed any device launched from the ground. Photographs presented to MSM clearly show a Ukrainian jet firing 30mm rounds from a "wings level" orientation. This evidence was obtained by a satellite but was discredited by Ukrainian Officials as not being the SU25 alleged to have been involved in the taking down of MH17. Upon examination of the satellite black and white image, it is clearly evident there is no way of positively identifying the jet because there are no visible indicators, since the photo is taken from ABOVE the SU25. The GPS co-ordinates combined with date and time stamp should be sufficient evidence to affirm or negate just whose fighter jet this was and to confirm where and when the image was taken. My investigations revealed a video showing that a device was activated from the ground but did not strike the Malaysian aircraft. Yes, a missile was launched from the ground but did not appear to strike the MH fuselage, though a distinct boom could be heard. The video footage which I located and viewed clearly shows the right engine on fire and the aircraft descending in a controlled, wings-level trajectory of app 45degrees.

• I did not observe any explosions or smoke until the aircraft impacted the ground. The MSM video footage showed an explosion with a large black plume of smoke. My observation was that this footage was taken at quite some considerable distance from the crash site, and I question whether whoever took the video footage could have actually gained access closer to the scene. The aircraft came down in a controlled descent [or what appeared to be.] Accordingly, there should have been sufficient time to get closer, depending on how soon they had arrived and started filming. It is also possible that given the conflict in the area, closer access may not have been possible, Regardless of this - Who didn't want any close-up footage being made available to the world?!

• The video footage shows silver round flecks in the smoke, along with vertical aluminium streaks with a resemblance in structure of descending party streamers. This is known as Chaff and is a product dispersed from Fighter Jets to deflect any heat seeking missiles. [Also called window. Military strips of metal foil dropped by an aircraft to confuse enemy radar by creating false blips. Reference: http://dictionary.com]

• Footage taken at the crash site shows a large blackened impacted area of ground. Close to the proximity are bodies. These are intact with no visual signs of decapitations, burns, blood, or other such injuries of any nature. They are still fully clothed. Video footage taken shows a plastic bag with a sizable number of passports. These passports are in "as-new" unblemished condition. There are no burn marks or damage. Some of the passports are opened to the holder's information inside the cover page. The information is clearly readable and I was able to cross-reference three names of which I observed. All names concurred with the Pax manifest. This manifest was especially difficult to locate in any non-corrupted readable version and took app four attempts to retrieve after trying different sources. It appeared someone didn't want this list to be easily located. One attempt produced a document as small as a postage stamp and was totally unreadable and unworkable. Another site told me and showed me the Pax details for MH17 but then when I copied and pasted it – on TWO instances – it displayed the manifest for MH370.

• My investigation poses the question of how those passports and bodies were in such pristine condition after having descended from FL320 and managed to end up within metres of the blackened and charred mess of the aircraft.

• A Russian Commander who was one of the first to access the crash site, made observations that the blood had been sucked out of the bodies, the people were deceased prior to "boarding" MH17 and the level of decomposition was in excess of that which would be expected from decomposing bodies in the lapsed timeframe from the crash to his arrival on site. My investigations lead to the conclusion that these bodies were most likely the Pax off MH370, and were in the cargo hold for the purposes of intentional disposal, using MH17 as the platform to facilitate this. Once again, I reiterate the nature of the footage which was available for presentation to the world via MSM, though these images are very tightly shot and conveniently fuzz out any bodies from being seen and potentially identified.

• The two Ukrainian SU25 Fighter Jets shadowed MH17 just behind and below the B772. Most likely with one on the left and one on the right. Malaysian Flight MH17 wreckage clearly shows multiple 30mm diameter rounds impacting and piercing the flight deck region on both sides of the fuselage. This is the same ammunition used by SU25 Fighter Jets and explains why the plane descended in a controlled manner rather than via an explosion. The photographic evidence I observed shows metal tearing of an inward trajectory. This validates that the impact was from the outside of the aircraft and not an explosion, which would exhibit metal tearing from the inside out.

• The photographic evidence [not released in MSM] shows some sizeable pieces of fuselage. [Ref. "Uncensored" magazine.] One photo shows the impacted area of the flight deck. Another shows the front right section of the fuselage, providing a crucial piece of evidence. 9M-MRO, the registration number of the aircraft which serviced MH370, had a window plated over, in the vicinity of the front right door. This was due to a reconfiguration of the cabin. This window was not in the airframe of 9M-MRD; the aircraft of which allegedly serviced MH17; yet this window plate is clearly shown in the photographic crash site evidence.
This then conclusively proves that the airframe as seen in the MH17 incident was actually that of MH370. In other words, MH370’s aircraft was utilized for the flight of MH17. The illusion is created that two Malaysian aircraft met their demise, when there was only ever one aircraft, which was used for both conspiracies. The second incident allowed for the disposal of the deceased Pax from the MH370 flight. This explains why there has been no substantial wreckage recovered of MH370, at the date of this updated report. [9M-MRO.] My belief is that pieces of this airframe will eventually be placed in the vicinity of the Southern Indian Ocean, where authorities claim MH370 vanished. [Refer updated notes under the first portion of this report which addresses MH370. One of the Flaperon's was found on La Reunion Island, near Madagascar.] The photos show the Ukrainian wreckage, allegedly from 9M-MRD, however it is claimed these photos could easily have been photo-shopped to change the MRO registration to MRD.
• Questions need to be asked as to why the scene of MH17 was so tightly guarded, particularly given that it was a commercial aircraft that was brought down and it was unlikely to be any threat to any nation at war. The CVR and FDR were removed from the scene and returned at a later stage by unauthorized persons. Why? The bodies were removed under close guard and sent to be DNA tested, yet we have not heard any findings from these forensic evaluations. To my knowledge, few bodies, [if any] have been released to relatives of the victims aboard "MH17."

• A five nation team has been assigned the task of compiling data and releasing a report on the incident in October. My investigations have revealed that Malaysia, The Netherlands, Belgium, Australia and Ukraine are involved in this exercise. It has been stated that all nations must agree on the findings, as presented in the report, whether they agree or not with the content of that report. http://sputniknews.com/europe/20150721/1024873652.html

• Malaysian MH17 was directed over Ukrainian airspace by a Spanish Air Traffic Controller, at the minimum FL320 permitted by any aircraft flying over any area of conflict. After the incident, Military Seniors went to the Controllers and instructed them what they were to say if they were questioned about the incident. The audio of the two Commanders discussing MH17 as being a commercial aircraft and not Military, was time-stamped the day before the Malaysian jet was shot down. So, how could this have been recorded unless they knew what was going to occur the next day?

• ALL previous ten Malaysian aircraft servicing the route which MH17 should have taken flew to the south of and not over Ukraine. There was absolutely no necessity to fly the route that MH17 flew that day of July 17 2014. My investigation asks the questions as to WHY this aircraft was intentionally re-routed over a war zone; one which it had absolutely no valid reason to take.

• The following item below appeared, [from memory] on Jim Stone's website. It makes for interesting reading! The MH17 service scheduled for July 17 2014 was "CANCELLED," according to this document. So the next big question is, "What happened to those Pax who were on the manifest and scheduled for travel on this service?" Were they killed and put into cargo also? An important aspect and something to definitely be asked of any inquiry or pending court case!

• My investigations revealed that President Vladimir Putin was en-route to Russia after returning from a BRICS conference in Argentina. BRICS is the name given to the five nations wishing to set up a monetary system independent of the American Petro-dollar. These BRICS nations are – Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. Malaysian Airlines has a white fuselage on this particular aircraft with red over blue livery forming a horizontal line along the length of the fuselage.

• Vladimir Putin's Antonov aircraft is fairly large and is exactly the same livery as Malaysian colours right down to similar colours on the tail insignia. The only difference is that Vladimir Putin's colours are reversed and trail off at the flight deck area. Further examination of evidence proves that Vladimir Putin's plane flew the EXACT same trajectory as the Malaysian B772. The only variance was that his aircraft flew over app 30 minutes later. The flight altitude was also FL320. The heading was identical.

• My investigations reveal that the Pro-Russian Separatists did not have any knowledge on the operation of, or have access to, any BUK missiles. It is my belief that The United States of America requested the Ukrainian Military to shoot down MH17 with the intention to create more tension between Russia and USA, and sending a clear message to Putin that "this is what we can do to you if you don't conform to our demands." The intention was to blame Russia for the demise of Malaysian MH17. This gave reason to increase the pressure and sanctions against Russia.
Don't let the URL on the following page fool you! The article is in support of Russia being the innocent victim of this deception by Ukraine and the United States of America.

http://new-rus.info/news/sensation_irrefutable_proof_of_guilt_putin_in_disaster_malaysian_boingo_777_putin_hit_boeing_777_personally_irrefutable_photos_putin_is/2014-07-29-131
FOOTNOTE – The Boeing 777 Aircraft has been in service for app 19 years and is deemed to be one of the safest aircraft flying today. There is app only four events recorded involving the Boeing 777. The likelihood of a major incident involving total loss and non-recovery of one of these aircraft is extremely minimal. The fact that TWO B772 aircraft were involved in catastrophic events, less than five months apart of each other, is no mere coincidence. Even more ridiculous is that both these aircraft are from the same airline; in this case – Malaysian. Sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction. These two incidents fully prove this statement does in fact apply to these aircraft events.
The aforementioned findings and data are as accurate as possible based on the indisputable evidence, which has been cross-referenced and substantiated through various media and other sources. However some content is the opinion of the Author of this document, based upon evidence uncovered during investigations. No responsibility will be assumed for any action any person takes in response to their interpretation of any portion of this report. There is no copyright assigned and you are free to distribute it or forward it on to any individual or organization, whether or not same are able to forward the contents to those enabled to legally act upon progressing these cases, with the intention of the truth being exposed.

"Whilst one can and should have their own opinions, one should not challenge the presented indisputable facts without having been through the investigation of the case, and accordingly uncovered events and data which makes sense, can be supported with evidence, and for which would stand the test of a Jury in an International Independent Court of Law.

To base a case on mere conjecture and personal opinion, is to fail in the duty of mortal justice to those directly affected by the outcome of that investigation, whether those said individuals be indeed surviving or deceased."


"Agent Kiwi" 
AD Private Intelligence Worldwide Network. 
Aviation Investigation Division 
July 08 2015


GLOSSARY ~

A322: Airbus A320-200
ACARS: Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System
APP: Approximately
ATC: Air Traffic Control
AUAP: Airbus Uninterruptible Auto Pilot
B772: Boeing 777-200ER B763: Boeing 767-300
BUAP: Boeing Un-Interruptible Auto Pilot
CIA: Central Intelligence Agency, USA Comms: Communications
CVR: Cockpit Voice Recorder [Records on-board flight deck audio]
DG: Diego Garcia Atoll Military Installation
FAA: Federal Aviation Administration
FBI: Federal Bureau of Investigation, USA
FDR: Flight Data Recorder [Records pertinent parameters & technical information of the flight]
FL: Flight Level [Followed by numbers] FL350 = 35,000ft
MSM: Mainstream Media
NSA: National Security Agency, USA NTSB: National Transportation Safety Board
9M-MRO: The registration number allocated to the B772 which serviced MH370
9M-MRD: The registration number allegedly allocated to the B772 which is purported to have serviced MH17

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 


AVIATION INVESTIGATION: FINAL REPORT OF EVENTS ~ 

Date of Original Report: 7-27-2015. Prepared by "Agent Kiwi" for the Abel Danger Aviation Investigative Team 
Updated 8-20-2015. [Fourth Revision]

PART THREE

GermanWings GWI18G: GW-4U-9525: Airbus A322 
Date of Incident: 3-24-2015 
Barcelona, Spain – Dusseldorf, Germany. P.O.B: 144: Crew 06: Total 150 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Want to follow progress on these Investigations? 
Contact: Captain Field McConnell [Retired]
fieldmcc@yahoo.com 
+001 715 307 8222 
@fieldmcc 

[Picture only... NOT the A322 aircraft which this report is based upon.]

WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO TRAVEL SAFELY IN THE HANDS OF EXPERIENCED FLIGHT CREW. WE CAN, [AND WE DO], UNTIL EXTERNAL INFLUENCES INTERVENE AND SEIZE CONTROL, FORCING INNOCENT PEOPLE TO BECOME PRISONERS AND INVOLUNTARY PARTICIPANTS OF WORLDWIDE EVIL ACTIVITIES. THESE ACTS ARE PEFORMED BY THE VERY PEOPLE WHO WE EXPECT TO PROTECT US AND ACT IN OUR BEST INTERESTS. THEY ARE NOTHING LESS THAN MASS MURDERERS!


SUMMARY OF GERMAN WINGS 4U-9525 ~
Downing of Aircraft Facts & Investigation Notes ~
Date of Preparation ~ July 27 2015
• This incident should flag serious concern to the world. It involves the hacking into AUAP systems aboard Airbus in order to commandeer a flight and use it for whatever nefarious purposes the perpetrators desired.

• This flight had its controls hacked into and over-ridden with the blame being pinned onto the 27 yr-old Co-Pilot, Andreas Lubitz. Lubitz was an innocent pawn in this deadly game of International Chess. He was NOT suicidal and this was not a suicide/homicidal activity by any member of the flight crew aboard the A322. GermanWings is a subsidiary of Lufthansa in the same manner Jetstar is owned by Qantas. Lufthansa are able to monitor all aircraft which are in-flight from their command centres and should be able to intercept flight deck operations and take manual control of any aircraft in their fleet in the event of an emergency or terrorist attempt. However, in the case of GW 4U-9525 they were effectively “locked out” of all controls; likewise were the flight crew. They were helpless to respond to the situation they were presented with.

• My investigations have revealed that the wreckage scene is not consistent with the debris field which would result in an aircraft impacting a mountainside. In this type of impact we should be witnessing a debris field similar to the Air New Zealand flight TE901, which slammed into Mt Erebus on November 28 1979, killing all 257 Souls aboard. The debris field hits in a configuration atypical with impact on a slope – NOT a circular radius with pieces of shrapnel dotted like dandruff in the mountain! [Refer pictures on Page 25]
[Credit: New Zealand Air Line Pilots' Association]

The tail section should remain reasonably intact, as is frequently the case with most accidents. This is why the CVR & FDR are housed in this section. Why does it survive? Probably because it’s at the rear, elevated, and not at the front position which would take the brunt of any crash impact.
• The debris field of GermanWings displayed small pieces of indistinguishable wreckage over a 1 mile circular radius. The nature of this debris field is consistent with a mid-air explosion. Accordingly, independent investigators concur that the Airbus A322 was compromised whilst still airborne. Further investigations uncovered some disturbing facts which prove the truth is being covered up by more than one nation. Investigators I am liaising with, who have extensive expertise and experience within the Aviation Industry, have concurred with these findings. In fact, there are very few pilots [if any] who believe this crash was a suicide or in any way associated with the claimed rogue actions of the Co-Pilot, Andreas Lubitz.

• Search & Rescue teams were on the scene in remarkably quick time, indicating that maybe a team[s] were in place ready and waiting for this event to unfold, and to ensure the scene was secured. The terrain is especially challenging with difficulty accessing it, let alone investigating and searching for wreckage/evidence. My sources claim that The German Chancellor, French President, and Italian President were collectively at the scene, and that this has never happened in any previous air disasters.

• With the wreckage field being substantially widespread, comprised of small pieces, and in an inhospitable area, it flags suspicion as follows –

• The CVR & FDR were retrieved within a couple of days. It seems quite likely the search teams knew exactly where to look, and what they were so desperate to recover.

• The voice and data recordings appeared to be salvageable according to reports and photos. Really? Take a look at the crash scene again. A CLOSE look - on non-MSM. It doesn’t look like a scene where anything much would have survived.

• Andreas Lubitz – A reasonably new Airbus "FAA Accredited" flight crew member. Six months earlier or for a period of six months, Lubitz was sent for FAA training in the USA. This is the equivalent of receiving advanced training not dissimilar to receiving accreditation as having attained a higher level of experience with A320 systems. This Co-Pilot had 630hrs rated flying time in an A320. My investigations led me to make contact with a now retired ex-military Fighter Pilot who served 22 years service in the United States of America, and a further career spanning decades flying commercially with American Commercial Carriers. He also spent time in another country for 18 months flying A320's and accrued 23,000hrs of incident free flying. He has stated that the actions Lubitz is alleged to have carried out would not and could not have been performed by a Pilot with Lubitz's level of experience. He went on to state that even he himself, despite having flown Fighter Jets, would not be able to configure the aircraft to manually execute what Lubitz has been alleged to have done. In other words – the claimed manoeuvre is not feasible to be manually flown. He has presented his observations to various people and organisations in Europe, UK, America, amongst others, including individuals worldwide who are actively investigating, pursuing the truth behind this conspiracy.

• Reports to mainstream media [MSM] claim that Lubitz was suicidal. This is not true. Lubitz had been to see various doctors as he was having visual issues and was anxious that his flying career could be terminated as a result and was attempting to hide this from his employer. He was naturally concerned and had a slightly deflated demeanour but was not suicidal. The doctor's note which was located torn up in Lubitz's flat has not been produced to the MSM for scrutiny, nor its contents fully revealed. I question whether this doctor's note ever existed or whether it was planted to place the blame on Andreas Lubitz.

• Claims have been made that the CVR had recorded Lubitz breathing normally through an oxygen mask. There are several anomalies with this. In the lead-up to an event such as Lubitz is alleged to have undertaken, it is unlikely for any breathing to be "normal." Breathing would have been intensified along with heart rate in correlation with the inbuilt human "fight or flight" programming.

• My sources state that oxygen masks have a "hot" or “cold" status. "Hot" meaning that the microphones are active for communication between the flight crew. They are left in a "cold" [i.e. microphone off setting] when not communicating, so that the crew are not subjected to hearing their own, or each others' breathing. The on-board voice recorders are not able to detect anything when the microphone is in this off cold status. For these reasons, it is highly improbable for the events claimed by those authorities "investigating" this incident to have occurred as they have portrayed them. The door control access to the flight deck could be accessed and locked via externally hacking into the flight controls. And YES, it can and has been done, as per references noted below.]
[Reference: recent hacking into Jeep Cherokee computer controlled SUV systems and taking over control of the vehicle. Reference: a Pax aboard a United Airlines flight who claims he was able to hack into the computer systems of the flight he was undertaking at the time. Reference: recently, the grounding of all United Airlines flights across the States for 8 minutes due to UA ground computer systems being hacked into and compromised.]
• It is an International requirement under Aviation Flight Rules that at any altitude above FL250 when one member of the flight crew vacates the flight deck leaving only one member remaining, that an oxygen mask is mandatory to be worn until the absent crew member returns to the flight deck. This explains why Lubitz would have been wearing the mask.
• Two other aspects don’t make any sense. If a member of the flight crew was going to commit an act of suicide it is unlikely he or she would be affixing an oxygen mask prior to taking this action. Also, the plane took many minutes to descend to point of impact with the Mountain Range. If Lubitz was suicidal, surely he would have aimed the aircraft into a vertical dive. This did not occur. The rate of descent increased per the laws of gravity etc, hence why the speed at impact was exceedingly high. There was no absolute guarantee that hitting the mountain would prove fatal and impact the integrity of the airframe as was experienced with this crash. Remember that the American Military Fighter Jet Pilot said even HE wouldn't be able to manually fly the manual configuration for the aircraft to behave as it did and impact the mountain – let alone a rookie Co-Pilot, with only 630hrs rated flying time on an Airbus A320 to his name!

• My investigations with my retired Pilot source and his team of experts have revealed the series of events which played out, based on data obtained, [but not currently presented to MSM for the general public.] ~

• Captain says to Lubitz, as per standard protocol, "You have control," prior to vacating the flight deck. Lubitz replies with "I hope so." Not an unreasonable or surprising response from a "newbie" crew member with only 630hrs rating under his belt. It’s a HUGE responsibility.

• Information obtained by international investigators within the aviation industry have produced evidence showing that prior to the GermanWings 4U-9525 event, fighter jets were present and in the immediate airspace. An Italian jet was in the vicinity monitoring events and made a transmission whilst on scene. Likewise, an American Fighter was also present and only observing. Three French fighter jets were shadowing the aircraft – one would be on each side, and one behind.

• According to my source, one French fighter would have flown parallel to the flight deck on the left side and signalled for the pilot to follow him. He would then turn away and circle around to see if the pilot was responding to his wishes. These jets had intercepted the A322 shortly after deviating from its intended standard flight path. The crew were locked out of the Airbus controls, likewise any communications, including any control from the Lufthansa control centre.

• Upon receiving no response from the Airbus crew, the fighter jet would have gone around alongside the pilot's window even closer than the first fly-by. He would have noticed that the pilot was not on the flight deck and that the co-pilot was wearing an oxygen mask. This would be an expected and acceptable situation if the GermanWings flight had not been hacked into and hadn't deviated from its original scheduled flight plan. It would have been standard protocol for a normal flight. The exception to this incident was the deviation of the lodged flight plan and the subsequent inability of Lufthansa to make contact with the Airbus crew or indeed, to override the systems and assume control of the aircraft. A fighter jet pilot, probably in his 20's and with limited time to respond, would have had to make the on-the-spot decision as to whether to "go hostile" with the Airbus and "take it out" then and there. His choice would only be whether to terminate GermanWings 4U-9525 in-flight and take the lives of 150 pax and crew or allow the aircraft to continue on its trajectory, thereby terminating the lives of potentially thousands.

• My aviation source advises that the Airbus A320 flight systems had been externally hacked into for the purposes of re-routing the aircraft over the mountains towards a dam which serviced multiple Hydro-Power Stations. Breaching this dam would have resulted in the loss of power, water supplies, and lives of the people living in towns below this area, which would have been wiped out by the extreme flood of the water flow.
All fighter jets dispersed upon termination of the GermanWings flight. To my knowledge this information has not been publicly released.
FOOTNOTE – It is very convenient to blame an incident such as the destruction of this Airbus A322 on the Co-Pilot, who is not alive to defend himself and present what really happened that day. There has been no evidence presented supporting these claims that Andreas Lubitz had any involvement or knowledge pertaining to the termination of the GermanWings aircraft. The general consensus amongst the Aviation Industry is that this was a pre-planned event with the Co-Pilot accused of the responsibility of causing it. The true perpetrators of this heinous crime are found within the Governments of the Countries who were playing out their issues with each other, and using this event to push a point home and as a bully tactic to show they mean business. ["Play by our rules.... or this is what we can do."] That this incident was not permitted to be conducted as planned, gives us good reason to thank the French fighter pilot who had to make a crucial and split-second decision whether GermanWings 9525 was in fact rogue and whether to terminate 150 lives in an effort to spare thousands more. Not a decision to be taken lightly or to be envied.
The aforementioned findings and data are as accurate as possible based on the indisputable evidence, which has been cross-referenced and substantiated through various media and other sources. However some content is the opinion of the Author of this document, based upon evidence uncovered during investigations. No responsibility will be assumed for any action any person takes in response to their interpretation of any portion of this report. There is no copyright assigned and you are free to distribute it or forward it on to any individual or organisation, whether or not same are able to forward the contents to those enabled to legally act upon progressing these cases, with the intention of the truth being exposed.

"Whilst one can and should have their own opinions, one should not challenge the presented indisputable facts without having been through the investigation of the case, and accordingly uncovered events and data which makes sense, can be supported with evidence, and for which would stand the test of a Jury in an International Independent Court of Law.

To base a case on mere conjecture and personal opinion, is to fail in the duty of mortal justice to those directly affected by the outcome of that investigation, whether those said individuals be indeed surviving or deceased."


"Agent Kiwi" 
AD Private Intelligence Worldwide Network 
 Aviation Investigations Division 
July 08 2015


GLOSSARY ~

A322: Airbus A320-200
ACARS: Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System
APP: Approximately
ATC: Air Traffic Control
AUAP: Airbus Un-Interruptible Auto Pilot
B772: Boeing 777-200ER
B763: Boeing 767-300
BUAP: Boeing Un-Interruptible Auto Pilot
CIA: Central Intelligence Agency, USA
Comms: Communications
CVR: Cockpit Voice Recorder [Records on-board flight deck audio]
DG: Diego Garcia Atoll Military Installation
FAA: Federal Aviation Administration
FBI: Federal Bureau of Investigation, USA
FDR: Flight Data Recorder [Records pertinent parameters & technical information of the flight] FL: Flight Level [Followed by numbers] FL350 = 35,000ft
MSM: Mainstream Media
NSA: National Security Agency, USA
NTSB: National Transportation Safety Board
9M-MRO: The registration number allocated to the B772 which serviced MH370
9M-MRD: The registration number allegedly allocated to the B772 which is purported to have serviced MH17


7 comments:

  1. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=cb8_1440304368

    ReplyDelete
  2. From 9/11 to Mass Surveillance, The Man Who Knew Too Much - Thomas Drake on RAI https://youtu.be/sngqrHapYGA

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thomas Drake is false opposition – a limited hangout.

    ReplyDelete
  4. MH17's first flight, apparently, was 17/7/97.

    FINAL – Spanish Air Controller @ Kiev Borispol Airport: Ukraine Military Shot Down Boeing #MH17.
    http://slavyangrad.org/2014/07/18/spanish-air-controller-kiev-borispol-airport-ukraine-military-shot-down-boeing-mh17/

    I may be mistaken/confused, Agent Kiwi, but I thought MH370 had Rolls Royce engines & that the BIOT/DG 06:51 data was confirmed by satellite relay to Derby, England.
    VP.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As far as I know VP, Yes, the engines were Rolls Royce Trent engines and sent data re performance etc back to Rolls Royce.
      Airlines usually lease their engines due to the cost - $20m per engine apparently.
      I recall Field saying MH370 [9M-MRO] electrics were shut down at 06:52.
      Regards,
      Agent Kiwi.

      Delete
  5. My mind is blown once again..IM not a military person or a pilot(dad was) What was MH370 used 4 on Diego Garcia and why?? I believe and know in my heart You are correct regarding all of this..How would they kill the people on DG and did they kill all of them? What was the reason 4 all of it..I get the Patent small chip item 40 billion $$$ was this the only reason?? butt..This is all mission impossible stuff-war games are really like this I AM learning..Thanks and Safe Wishes 2 You..Sincerely, CN

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I believe the Air Tranquliser Injector {ATI} was used to terminate the passengers before 370 landed at DG. This is a system which was installed as an anti-terrorism message. Depending on the dose you can either subdue, sleep or kill people [think= type of anesthesia.]
      This would explain why the cellphones were ringing but not being answered; and cellphones WILL operate at FL390 - a friend confirmed this for me when he forgot to switch to flight mode and received a call. Also confirmed by flight crew.
      Multiple reasons/uses for aircraft being taken out of circulation....
      Create the illusion aircraft disappeared then at some stage conveniently claim the insurance. I have heard that 9M-MRO had maintenance issues and as such may have been a good reason to get rid of it.
      *The wafer patent for the microchip Kinetis KL03 was one reason for incident.
      * Use Aircraft for MH17 event - we have conclusive evidence of this - photographic evidence. MH17 showed as a cancelled flight on the Aircraft scheduling sheet. As to what happened to pax who were scheduled to board is a question I still need to work on.
      It's very complicated to explain here and it reads crazier than a movie script. The general public can't understand or don't want to understand it.

      MH17 was a staged event for the purpose of blaming Russia for infringing on Ukraine and accordingly placing tough sanctions on Russia.
      Russia had nothing to do with it. The USA got the Ukraine to do the dirty work and then they blame Russia.
      The majority of the reports, of which I compiled, contain statements which I believe can be substantiated and successfully proven in an independent international law court. I have taken great care to ensure the info provided is not merely my opinion or speculation and can be supported by data and disinformation. The people behind this have already proven they have lied - on numerous occasions. They have no scruples nor conscience and we will not roll over, play dead, or go away. Thanks for your questions. It's "Mission Screw my head in" stuff and not easy to piece together. I only began looking into things after their initial 9 days of bullshite. Had they not spun that crap I wouldn't have raised a heckle. 370 did not crash in any ocean and if their claims of suicide or mechanical/electrics/systems failures was true... why did 370 turn like it did and not fly in a straight line.... and if it was an emergency... who the F**k turns off their communications when they have an emergency.
      They couldn't lie straight if they tried..... and these incidents aren't the only aircraft to have suffered nefarious activities...from the very organisations we think are looking after our best interests. The only terrorists in the world are our Governments.

      Delete

Who's visiting Abel Danger
view a larger version of the map below at whos.amung.us

You Too can be a CAPTAIN SHERLOCK