Saturday, March 19, 2016

Jewish hypocrisy regarding violence

Source: jimstonejournalist

March 18, 2016

Mayhem

Over 5,000 Soros-backed protesters will "storm the Trump Tower in New York" tomorrow. Let's see if the NYPD is there to protect the place. If they are not, we will then know beyond a doubt that the police really do work for the enemy.

It is now obvious that Hillary, Soros, Obama, and others think they need to control the country with acts of terror and violence. I do not know how Soros can get away with it when it has been openly published that the violent protesters are his. One of Trump's homes has been evacuated, evidently the one he was using the most lately. Details are sketchy.

More violent protestors show up at a Trump rally than fans show up at a Clinton rally. Soros is obviously turning America into the third world, and now it looks like the same tactics are going to be used on America that were used on the Arab Spring. However, the difference this time is that everyone knows who the perpetrator is: SOROS HAS HIS BUTT HANGING OUT IN THE WIND THIS TIME – everyone knows who the perpetrator and rightful target of any response is this time.

Soros is right up there with the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds, but unlike the other two, Soros is unable to keep his dirty work hidden. Therefore we know who the attacker is. Good.

Paul Ryan: Violence is not acceptable

The Speaker of the US House of Representatives has sharply condemned Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump for predicting riots if he is denied the party's nomination for president.

"Nobody should say such things in my opinion because to even address or hint at violence is unacceptable," said Paul Ryan, a Republican who represents Wisconsin's 1st congressional district.

MY COMMENT: "to even address or hint at violence is unacceptable"??!!?? Oh, you mean like when you used the military to commit mass violence against now proven innocents in Iraq? Or how about setting up the death of God knows how many Syrians? What about Libya? Seems to me like violence is great as long as you are not the one receiving it.

Try to tell me, dear Paul, how Syria, Iraq, or Libya ever threatened you, yet you applauded as they were murdered in cold blood. You and your cronies are the masters of violence, and only stand against it when you are a little worried it might be directed at you.

I remember a laundromat owned by the descendants of refugees from Ukraine, where Paul's ilk murdered more than 30 million in cold blood. They posted in all the windows the full reality of what happened there, and I patiently read it all. The Jews started out with a campaign against violence, and made every Ukrainian believe that violence was wrong; so they did nothing as their fields were burned, and they were set up for destruction. The Jews moved into the finer homes, ousting the rightful occupants by force. They sat there and supervised the death of the Ukrainian people with countless armed guards outside the best homes, to protect them just in case there was any "violence", and sat there and watched as millions died around them from starvation, a totally non-violent death.

The Jews enforced a non-violent end to millions, with a threat of violence if anyone did anything to stop them. If they did not know violence was an effective balance against tyranny, they would have never had guarded homes. When it comes to violence, the Jew is the master of its efficient use.

If people actually believe violence is always wrong, they will get eaten by the wolves in a totally non-violent way. They will be destroyed by a non-violent GMO, tainted vaccine, drug, or whatever other "non-violent" perversion the masters of violence dream up, and when the masters of violence decide the time is right, they use open violence unchecked, as Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya prove absolutely. They have it nailed from all sides, and are quickly proving that having their own violence returned to them is the only answer.

Violence is acceptable when elections get stolen. In that case, violence is the ONLY ANSWER. And the need for a direct physical response from the people is only increased when the fact that the elections are stolen is never reported by a media which is owned by the same violent people that are stealing them.

Violence is acceptable when the bonds of slavery must be broken. In that case, violence is the ONLY ANSWER.

Violence is acceptable when a system is in place that enforces tyranny on the people, and only violence will overthrow that tyranny – case in point, when the peaceful process is rendered irrelevant by a rigged vote.

I am sick of scamming kikes saying violence is always wrong, when they use it in abundance both passively and aggressively on a nearly constant basis; and when direct violence is the reality they themselves created as the only solution to the current problem they caused, they talk about how unacceptable it is for the nobodies of this world to resort to it.

ONCE AGAIN, TRUMP IS RIGHT WHEN HE AT LEAST INDIRECTLY STATED THE PEOPLE HAVE A RIGHT TO STAGE RIOTS. WHAT ELSE COULD POSSIBLY BE THE ANSWER THIS TIME? OBVIOUSLY THIS WOULD AMOUNT TO DIRECT PHYSICAL ACTION AND VIOLENCE AGAINST THE ELECTION-STEALING JEW NWO TYRANTS WHO HAVE TAKEN OVER VIA RIGGED ELECTIONS AND ARE KILLING THE COUNTRY ON PURPOSE SO THE NWO CAN TAKE OVER. WE HAVE A RIGHT TO VIOLENCE TO STOP THAT. THE SECOND AMENDMENT PROVES OUR FOREFATHERS WERE SMART ENOUGH TO SEE IT.
________

How Trump Will Stop The Election Steal 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Who's visiting Abel Danger
view a larger version of the map below at whos.amung.us

You Too can be a CAPTAIN SHERLOCK