Plotting a Russian Benghazi: Is Hillary Clinton behind Ambassador Karlov's murder?
December 23, 2016 - Fort Russ - Ruslan Ostashko, Live Journal - translated by J. Arnoldski -
I was taught to always look for two things in every crime: who has a motive and who has the tools to realize their criminal plans. Based on these two principles, I am inclined to believe that there is great probability that Hillary Clinton is personally behind the murder of our ambassador to Turkey.
The former Secretary of State and presidential candidate had a very serious motive to order this crime. This motive is not rational, but this does not mean that it is any less serious. This motive is exacting personal revenge on the Russian president. But let's start with the other question: did Hillary Clinton have the capability of organize the murder of the Russian ambassador? Yes.
Turkish authorities are already saying that the murder was linked to the Fethullah Gulen's secret organization which is famous for its close ties to the CIA and US State Department. As experts following Islamic organizations are saying, the claim that the armed Jaish al-Fath opposition coalition (earlier known as Al-Nusra) had taken responsibility for Andrey Karlov’s murder turned out to be a fake.
Putting all of these factors together, the theory that the murderer worked for Gulen's organization is more convincing. This organization's links to the CIA and State Department are well known. They include financing as well as legal, organizational, and informational support. No wonder Gulen has lived in the US for many years and American authorities refuse to extradite this "preacher" to Turkey.
If the killer really is from this organization, and this is precisely what Turkish authorities are saying, then there are only two variants to explain what happened: (1) either Gulen has gone insane and lost all fear and sense of self-preservation and decided to sanction the murder of the Russian ambassador without approval from his American sponsors and old friends, or (2) he got permission or even the order from someone to organize this assassination.
Gulen could have received approval or such an order from American intelligence, specifically the CIA, i.e., the team that tried to bring Hillary Clinton to power, or from Donald Trump's team. I don't believe that Donald Trump would have approved such. First of all, he wins nothing from this. Secondly, it is unlikely that such a staunch supporter of the Clinton clan as Gulen would suddenly decide to change masters.
In fact, there is a good book by ex-FBI agent Sibel Edmonds about Gulen's patrons in the CIA and how the CIA uses his organization's cells in Central Asia. The book tells, among other things, of how the former head of the CIA's presence in Kabul personally resolved Gulen's issues with American immigration services.
Thus, we are dealing with a situation in which the murder was most likely committed by a representative of an organization tied to the CIA which, with varying degrees of success, has been used for color revolutions. No one gains any political benefit from murdering the Russian ambassador, and only a complete idiot could assume that Putin will now get angry and start bombing Ankara. Our enemies are not idiots. The attack on the ambassador looks more like an action intended to show both supporters and opponents of Clinton that the supranational elite still has gunpowder.
Try to look at this situation not through the eyes of a Russian, but through the eyes of an American politician. When you look at the footage of Andrey Karlv's murder, you'll be reminded of Griboyedov, but an American politician will remember the death of Ambassador Stevens in Benghazi. The murder of the American ambassador in Libya was a serious personal nightmare for Hillary Clinton which has haunted her for many years and very negatively impacted her political career.
Let's recall the background of this story which American officials and journalist from Hillary Clinton's pool don't like to talk about. Ambassador Stevens was killed by terrorists in Benghazi, Libya which was (attention!) under the control of militants fighting against Gaddafi. The terrorists stormed the US consulate in Benghazi and killed the ambassador along with several guards. This is the official version which is missing a few details that have since been unearthed by American media and are really unpleasant for Hillary Clinton, who sent the ambassador to Benghazi.
These details were exposed by Seymour Hersh, the famous American journalist and human rights activist, Pulitzer Prize winner, free press contributor awarded by the Media Foundation in Leipzig, winner of the Ridenhour Prize and other international awards. This journalist writes, citing his sources in the US intelligence services and sources in the US Senate, that the Benghazi consulate dealt with only one thing: the transfer of arms from Libyan militants to Syrian militants of the so-called 'Free Syrian Army.' The consulate had no political role.
Citing its own sources, Fox News has reported that literally an hour before his murder, Ambassador Stevens held talks on the transfer of an S-200 from Libyan militants to Syria. Even the name of the Turkish ship which was chartered for this purpose was revealed along with the fact that a Turkish diplomat participated in the negotiations.
Apparently, the negotiations went bad. This is not the first case in which the snake has bitten its handler. For the Americans, this was not the first time they created their own Bin Laden only to then suffer negative consequences.
For Hillary Clinton, the murder of Ambassador Stevens and especially his participation in transferring arms from Libya to Syria were a big problem. First of all, Congress had not given permission for such operations, and this was a very serious problem. CNN said that CIA officers working in Libya had warned that not only they, but also their families, would have problems if someone informed Congressman of what they were really doing in Benghazi.
Secondly, Clinton was blamed for having sent Stevens to Benghazi without guaranteeing him standard security.
Thirdly, the lie which her State Department told about Stevens' activities is plain ridiculous. For example, the State Department claimed that the ambassador had gone to Benghazi to open a cultural center. Can you imagine a cultural center in the middle of a city taken by radical Islamic terrorists?
All of these aspects became a personal nightmare for Hillary Clinton, an eternal stain on her image, and an eternal occasion for her competitors to criticize here. And now let's recall how she openly said that she has a personal conflict with Vladimir Putin. She claimed that Putin personally took revenge on her by personally organizing the hacking that led to her electoral defeat.
What could this ambitious American hawk do? How could she repair her reputation as a strong politician capable of delivering a painful blow at Vladimir Putin himself? Do you all not think that the murder of an ambassador who via diplomatic canons is the personal representative of the Russian president, is a perfect revenge? In fact, this is quite in Clinton's character. Just remember how she rejoiced over Gaddafi's murder.
Hillary Clinton on Gaddafi: We came, we saw, he died
Do you all not think that we have before us a successful attempt to force Putin to live through his own Benghazi? Hillary Clinton and the elite grouping that supports her could not organize a hacking of United Russia. In fact, I'm not even sure if United Russia has a server. They couldn't have organized terrorist attacks in Russia, even though they may have tried. But they did have the resources to murder Russia’s ambassador to Turkey, and not only the resources, but an entire organization that they have nurtured and controlled for decades.
Revenge for the elections - there's your motive. Gulen's organization - there's your tool for realization. And you also have the accusations against Putin, whom some of our fellow citizens blame for not organizing standard security for the ambassador. From the Americans' point of view, this was a real "Russian Benghazi", that is, if you leave out the fact that our ambassador was opening a photo exhibition and not peddling missiles for terrorists.
Maybe we, ordinary citizens, will never learn the truth, or maybe only our grandchildren will. But if I were investigating this crime, Hillary Clinton would clearly be number one on the list of suspects no matter how wild or conspiratorial this theory might seem to some. What do you think?
Trey Gowdy Calls Out The Media For FAKE NEWS
Trey Gowdy Destroys Elijah Cummings In front Of Hilary Clinton
Trey Gowdy Urges Donald Trump To Reopen Hillary Clinton Investigation
Day 60 - Where is Eric Braverman?
Day 61 - Where is Eric Braverman?
Day 62 - Where is Eric Braverman?
Day 63 - Where is Eric Braverman?
Day 63 - Where is Eric Braverman? Part 2
Day 64 - Where is Eric Braverman?
Day 65 - Where is Eric Braverman?
Day 65 - Where is Eric Braverman? Part 4
From Part 4 immediately above addendum: Recently released video coverage of weapons and munitions recovered by the Syrian Arab Army and Russia inside of Aleppo, Syria from storage facilities of ISIS. Are the blue canisters video tapped beginning at the 7:54 point in this video clip below used for sarin gas delivery? Now the question is, were there chemical weapons experts on the Russian TU-154 aircraft that crashed into the Black Sea along with the Red Army Choir?
أسلحة تقدر بمليارات الدولارات ضبطتها القوات السورية في مخازن الإرهابيين في حلب
Day 66 - Where is Eric Braverman?
The New World Order, a picture so incredible few could imagine
In the linked article below, Max Blumenthal is running PR for the "White Helmets" in Syria. Watch for Max Blumenthal to begin pushing for the white helmets to be nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize:
How the White Helmets Became International Heroes While Pushing U.S. Military Intervention and Regime Change in Syria
Eva Bartlett gives a completely different report on these 'white helmets' (white helmets during the day; terrorists at night):
Eva Bartlett on the White Helmets Hoax & the Information War against Syria
Back in September, 2016 21st Century Wire did a couple of excellent exposes on the white helmets in an "EXCLUSIVE: The REAL Syria Civil Defence Exposes Fake 'White Helmets' as Terrorist-Linked Imposters" that readers would be well informed if they read:
EXCLUSIVE: The REAL Syria Civil Defence Exposes Fake 'White Helmets' as Terrorist-Linked Imposters
From the expose above, we learn that Rami Abdulrahman (Wikipedia spelling; his name is probably formed like this: Abdul-Rahman) runs the Syrian Observatory of Human Rights (SOHR) out of the UK and was established in May, 2016 in Coventry, three months after this international criminal conspiracy against Syria started in March, 2016. SOHR has a fairly sophisticated website set up which gives it that appearance of "professionalism" and that it actually cares about "human rights" ("human rights" is a completely bogus construct) of the Syrian people who have been ruthlessly victimized. Consolidated Contractors Company (CCC) is alleged to be financing the white helmets' operating in Syria. The son of Rami Abdul-Rahman, is alleged to be Kamel Abdul-Rahman. Kamel Abdul-Rahman is connected to the Consolidated Contractors Company.
Who is behind Syrian Observatory for Human Rights?
RT finds Western media's key source on Syria
RT finds Western media's key source on Syria
From the 21st Century Wire article linked above on the "white helmets", the following paragraph exposes who set up the white helmets and provided the training:
"White Helmets founder [James] Le Mesurier, who graduated from Britain's elite Royal Military Academy at Sandhurst, is said to be an 'ex' British military intelligence officer involved in a number of other NATO 'humanitarian intervention' theatres of war, including Bosnia, Kosovo and Iraq, as well as postings in Lebanon and Palestine. He also boasts a series of high-profile posts at the UN, EU, and UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Not to mention his connections back to the infamous Blackwater (Academi)."Meet James Le Mesurier:
Syria White Helmets; Involved, In Jihadist Executions!
In the short video clip below, is this not publicly stating you want to murder someone? By his own admission is this not an "act of war" to threaten to kill Russians? On December 20, 2016 the Russian Ambassador Andrei Karlov in Ankara, Turkey, was assassinated in cold-blood. Previous to this the United States repeatedly and publicly threatened "retaliation" against Russia for allegedly "hacking" the 2016 US presidential elections. Then on December 24, 2016 the Russian Tu-154 aircraft carrying 64 members of the renowned Alexandrov Ensemble, the Russian army's official choir, and its conductor Valery Khalilov were killed when the aircraft crashed into the Black Sea.
Kill Russians, kill Iranians, scare Assad! - Ex CIA deputy Mike Morell -
August 8 - Charlie Rose
Media blackout on death of NATO auditor - was he assassinated to cover-up NATO's black budget?
Mystery as NATO Auditor General is found shot dead in suspicious circumstances
The Red Line and the Rat Line
Clinton Donors Want to Investigate How Hillary Spent $1.5 Billion in Campaign Donations
NATO Auditor Who Discovered US Funds ISIS Found Murdered
Toward a Pax Russica in Syria?
This is an "extortion wheel."