Saturday, December 24, 2016

Obama's Genealogy and so much more



by Miles Mathis

First published October 19, 2016

As usual, this is just my opinion, based on personal research.

Some have accused me of avoiding current topics for older ones, and therefore somehow misdirecting. I guess they missed my papers on Donald Trump, Thomas Pynchon, SpaceX, gravity waves, Leo DiCaprio, Val Kilmer, the Orlando shooting, Harry Potter, David Bowie, Prince, Kurt Cobain, Paul McCartney, John Lennon, Bob Dylan, Tiger Woods, John Nash, Monica Lewinsky, O. J. Simpson, Noam Chomsky, Steve Jobs, the Unabomber, Fidel Castro, David Irving, 911, Sandy Hook, Naomi Klein, Christina Hoff Sommers, Elon Musk, Duncan and Blake, Stephen Hawking, Taylor Swift, Sam Harris, Graham Hancock, Tom Wolfe, the Santa Barbara shooting, the Charleston shooting, Wendell Berry, the Boston Marathon shooting, the 2012 election, Ron Paul, the Trayvon Martin shooting, Adam Gopnik, the Chapman Brothers, Mark Zuckerberg, and my previous papers on Obama. But although their complaint has no content, and is actually misdirection itself, I do like to hit the old big events, for obvious reasons. These older events define the current dialog by creating an historical backdrop against which these newer events are seen.

Plus, the newer events have gotten so absurd they almost out themselves. I have trouble taking most of current culture seriously. I have a hard time believing anyone still buys the mainstream patter. But I can understand why people buy the mainline history: it has been pounded into us from the cradle. We have all defined ourselves—at least in part—in relation to these facts we think we know. Therefore, I see it as much more important to attack these foundations. Once they fall, all the newer events will automatically fail. A person who comes to understand what the Salem Witch Trials really were, or what the death of Abraham Lincoln really was, cannot be fooled by the talking heads in the media any longer.

Before we get to the main course here, I will answer four other complaints from the fake forums, some of which contradict one another. First, they say one person couldn't possibly do all the things I do. Second, they complain that my email responses are short or "brisk". Well, my email responses are brisk because I get hundreds of emails a day from strangers, some of them quite long, and I simply don't have time in a day to respond fully to everything in every one. To respond in equal length would require 24 hours a day in email. I can't believe no one has thought of that. Plus, since I am actually doing all the things I claim to do—alone and without assistance of any kind—that means I am quite busy every day. It would actually be much more suspicious if I were able to respond fully to hundred of emails a day, and do all these other things as well, wouldn't it? Third they complain I don't have any photos up. They must have missed this page on my site. That's where you are taken if you click on my photo on my front page. If they aren't satisfied with that, I encourage them to tell us what other researcher has more photos up than I do, from all ages. Fourth, they say I don't talk about 911. Which means they must have missed many pages on my site, not least of all my links page, which has dozens of links to 911 papers and exposes, including my own. Beyond that, I talk about 911 in many other papers on other topics. Most of those are from several years ago, yes, but they are still up on my site and I have not changed my mind about 911.

Please go to Miles Mathis' website to read the entire essay Obama's Genealogy and so much more, or you can read the entire essay in PDF form.
________

Meet the designer family complete with rento-kids:

Obama Girls REAL PARENTS Found? Adopted By Michelle, Or Borrowed?
 

5 comments:

  1. Good research and paper . I came tothesame conclusion yrs ago while looking up Julia Gillard the Aust leader also from Wales who's real family name was Gilliad related to some mad female leader in Europe long ago , Theyalso havean Abbott leader {idiot i must say / I think there were also a knight called Gilliad ?? The way i see it is one identity has beenthere through the ages running evrything which must be key and most likely the very 1st spooks , Like confess your sins etc . Some people sure are dumb is all i can say . The first pope who actually is a single bishop presiding over the diocese of Rome was Pius I (142 - 155).

    In addition to the fact that there isn’t really any evidence for the existence of a church administration under the leadership of Peter, there isn’t even any evidence for such an administration under many of his successors. All available evidence points to the existence not of a monoepiscopal structure but instead to committees of elders (presbyteroi) or overseers (episkopoi). This was standard in Christian communities all over the Roman empire. Not until a couple of decades into the first century do letters from Ignatius of Antioch describe churches led by a single bishop who was merely assisted by the presbyters and deacons.

    Even once a single bishop can definitively be identified in Rome, his powers were not at all like what we see in a pope today. The bishop of Rome did not call himself the “Vicar of Christ“ (the first to do so was Gelasius I, 492 - 496). The bishop of Rome did not have the Roman Curia to govern other churches. He did not call for church councils or write encyclicals. Pope Sylvester I (314 - 335) didn’t even attend the first ecumenical Council of Nicea, much less call it (that was done by Constantine the Great).

    The bishop of Rome did not have the power or authority to require things like clerical celibacy — in fact, it is likely that several of the earliest popes were married, just as Peter was. Four, if not more, early popes were themselves sons of priests (Sixtus I, Damasus I, Boniface I, Innocent I) and this wouldn’t have been possible if their parents weren’t validly married. Greg Hallet most likely another spook of sorts and a supposed orphan has done some very interesting research along your lines Miles .A proxy even like IQUIX will usually get you past the blockages or Linux proxies . There must be a reason they all go to the same brainwashing Universities , yet appear to be as dumb as bricks when in power . https://youtu.be/Sm4WwjULRJ0 Scam artists all of them . Notice how all the supposed enemies in history are now best mates ? Japan, USA Russia , China etc , the whole thing isa joke .

    ReplyDelete
  2. Miles Margus may be interested in this guy , he is pretty close tothe matk i think ,He does this professionaly for a living , although some seemto be off the mark a lot are not . Know them by their nose i say. http://www.wellaware1.com/pentagon911/

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is for Miles MATHIS . By now most everyone has seen the photos of the person said to be Obama’s mother posing nude, but did anyone stop to look at the woman that’s with her? she looks very familiar and might have some splainin’ to dooo! http://www.wellaware1.com/obamas-mother/

    ReplyDelete
  4. I loathe this piece of garbage sh$$ barry stero from Hawaii, Indonesia, usa..he is a good actor 4 the idiots..he keeps his cool most of the time and he gets away with being Mr Classy..My ass..He is the worst, most vile, sinful, evil monster we have had in the off white house..I LOATE this big ears creep..I loathe his lisp and his vicious, hateful wifey..Good Ridance Barry..Many of us know who you are..bang bang..

    ReplyDelete

Who's visiting Abel Danger
view a larger version of the map below at whos.amung.us

You Too can be a CAPTAIN SHERLOCK